Kepabar

joined 1 year ago
[–] Kepabar@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago

Tell that to the dude who will probably never have a partner.

[–] Kepabar@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not everyone cares so much about that.

Someone knowing things about me in general is not a big deal.

[–] Kepabar@startrek.website 3 points 1 year ago

Y'all joke, but we pretty much had this with the La Sirena in Picard.

[–] Kepabar@startrek.website 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes, they exist, but then so do lesbian women.

The existence of homosexuality doesn't make the gender imbalance any less painful.****

[–] Kepabar@startrek.website 16 points 1 year ago

Wasn't.

It was put on hold while both sides argued for and against it.

The prosecutor won the argument and the hold was removed.

[–] Kepabar@startrek.website 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Old timey American slang for black person, meant to have a derogative tone.

[–] Kepabar@startrek.website 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I was pointing out that this statement you made:
Gaza has a majortiy of Muslims but never rejected "citizenship" to Jews or Christians.

Is very, very wrong.

[–] Kepabar@startrek.website -2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'm not sure this is correct in respect to Gaza.

The requirements for citizenship under pre-hamas in Gaza is your father must be an Palestinian Arab. There is no naturalization process that allows you to bypass this requirement. That is the definition of an ethnostate.

While I can't find any record on if Hamas changed the law, I highly doubt they did considering their political stance.

[–] Kepabar@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Realistically a governments first responsibility before anything else is the physical safety of it's citizenship.

If you know a percentage of a population are religious extremists which will never integrate into your society and will probably pose a risk, then how can you, as a government, take them in?

It's a hard sell any way you slice it.

[–] Kepabar@startrek.website 7 points 1 year ago

Correct, the state passed a law allowing those cases where statue of limitations have been passed for criminal trails to still sue their attacker in civil court.

It's been suggested this was passed specifically to target Trump, but a good number of sexual assaults never go reported and I believe a few hundred cases have come from this law.

It has since expired, it was only valid for one year.

view more: ‹ prev next ›