LanyrdSkynrd

I mostly agree about the cybertruck. It's a stupid vehicle that shouldn't exist, but it looks cool.

Note to anyone else trying it, the test doesn't score you, so don't submit unless you've saved your answers.

Here's the answer key:

Tell them Democrats want to ban it

To me this shows that The Daily Wire is not simply grifters grifting for the money. If it was just about scamming their fans for money, they'd see which way the wind was blowing and shut up about this. Instead they're carrying water for the most unsympathetic billionaires at the cost of angering their fans.

The Daily Wire since inception has been first and foremost about representing the interests of capital, even over their own personal financial interests. They know who made the Daily Wire possible, and it wasn't chuds, it was fossil fuel billionaires.

I doubt most of their fans will understand this, though.

You could have 1 truck for 50 houses and it would sit unused most of the time. Most people need their trucks to move and maybe a few times a year to haul stuff from home depot.

I'm now fairly sure the wild cat I saw recently was a bobcat. There was some recent light snow and when I ran in that area again I saw what I'm fairly certain are bobcat tracks. 4 toed with a indent on the main pad at the top-center, no claws, about 2.5 inches long.

I also found someone saying that bobcats can have brown fur in fall to early winter and I found this video of bobcats playing with one having the same color fur I saw and a longer tail with different colored bit at the end of the tail.

One of the details that made me think it wasn't a bobcat was that the tail was not just a little stub like most of the images I found online. Also, I didn't notice spots. But mostly seeing it from the back, if it's coat was similar to the cat in the video, I wouldn't have immediately noticed spots.

That's crazy. Failing a drug test is probably not legal cause to evict you, and refusing to take the test almost certainly is not. Of course they can do a no-cause eviction if you don't have a lease.

Landlords can and do put all kinds of unenforceable clauses in leases, though. There's no incentive not to because some people will see that they've violated an unenforceable clause and simply move out assuming that it is legal.

How is that legal? Do you mean they can demand a drug test randomly?

It would be litigated when/if a prosecutor tried to bring charges against Trump for conduct that was self-pardoned

I'm not convinced he'll do any serious level of tariffs. Too much American business relies on China to risk getting into a massive trade war. I think he'll do some strategic tariffs to benefit a couple industries and be able to say he won the trade war.

Talking about tariffs is good for him politically, good for the economy(people and businesses are making purchases early in anticipation of tariffs), and will bring in lobbying money from various industries that want protection, but an actual trade war will be devastating to the American economy broadly. I don't think the ruling class will let him do it.

I thought a lot about this. I think most of the big buyers of this were the same shitcoin gamblers that buy everything else. It's mostly people who know everything in crypto is a scam, but think they can make some money by predicting what will be popular and timing their trades.

At least I hope nobody is taking financial advice from someone so briefly famous for something stupid.