ProstheticBrain

joined 1 year ago

They're talking about pulling it open as in the pic, which makes it get cold, let's all the goodness fall out and ruins the dippiness imo.

But you do you, I'm not your abuella.

[–] ProstheticBrain@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It's a birria taco but your point still stands.

I'd be pretty surprised if this didn't have something to do with the Great Green Wall project, even if it's a knock on effect of that work.

It's a reference to a film called The Thing.

The current version of Peggle is utterly unplayable, monetised trash.

However, I recently dug out a first gen iPod touch that hasn't been connected to the internet in ~15 years, it's got 1 game on it, og Peggle.

It's gained a new lease of life as a standalone peggle console and I love it.

[–] ProstheticBrain@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

ingredients to a recipe may well be subject to copyright, which is why food writers make sure their recipes are "unique" in some small way. Enough to make them different enough to avoid accusations of direct plagiarism.

E: removed unnecessary snark

Not sure how long it's been since you saw the movie but it starts and ends with a much older Rose in the modern era, on board a research vessel out looking for the wreck of the Titanic. While aboard she starts telling the story of her time on the Titanic, that story then becomes the rest of the film. There's a sort of prologue at the end where she wraps it up, then passes away in bed.

I think that's what OP is talking about.

[–] ProstheticBrain@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Not sure how long it's been since you saw the movie but it starts and ends with a much older Rose in the modern era, on board a research vessel out looking for the wreck of the Titanic. While aboard she starts telling the story of her time on the Titanic, that story then becomes the rest of the film. There's a sort of epilogue at the end where she wraps it up, then passes away in bed.

I think that's what OP is talking about.

[–] ProstheticBrain@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Given that monitors tend to be wider than they are high, can't see how this is a win tbh. Unless you're going vertical monitor, then it's the same real estate right?

E: words E2: I reread, if you can find that add-on I'd love to know what it is.

I will look at this but I never have more than 4 tabs open so...

[–] ProstheticBrain@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Yeah, I didn't really think you had that many tabs open in one window. But it was funny to think someone might have done that. Think how small they'd be!

[–] ProstheticBrain@sh.itjust.works 17 points 4 weeks ago (18 children)

Each tab must have been one micron wide, how did you even expect to be able to click on a specific one in the future with that many open - wait, I think I've answered my own question.

 

If you think this contains spoilers lmk, I listened to it early on and didn't feel that way but I'm happy to take this down if we feel otherwise.

 

What kind of threshold should a vote have to pass before being implemented? Do we really want to be making changes based on a vote that only got one "Aye"? Ten Ayes? Over 50% of the user base?

What kind of vote engagement can we reasonably expect to achieve? Is it actually likely that 50% of the user base will engage with any particular vote? Are there any useful presidents out there?

Who should be responsible for counting the votes when they're over? Perhaps the OP tallies the votes and edits the post?

Is there an easy test the mods can apply to a tallied vote to allow them to check whether it's passed? Something that is not open to interpretation and results in a clear directive to make a change?

I'm also kind of testing out this discussion format as a way of generating things to vote on i.e DISCUSSION > POLL > VOTE seems to make sense.

We'll see :)

view more: next ›