Sage_the_Lawyer

joined 1 year ago
[–] Sage_the_Lawyer@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Yeah some counties use pointlessly complicated programs to distribute videos. I often have to try a few different players on windows to find one that works. If VLC has trouble with something, are there others you'd recommend as well?

[–] Sage_the_Lawyer@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This is a great tip, I'll definitely do some test runs, thanks!

[–] Sage_the_Lawyer@lemmy.world 29 points 9 months ago (37 children)

This seems like a good thread to ask this.. I'm sure I could find the answers I need myself but frankly I trust the userbase here more than most online articles.

As my username hints at, I'm a lawyer. I'm considering starting my own firm as a solo practitioner. I need a computer and/or laptop for it, and as a new business my budget would be pretty tight. I've mostly only ever used windows, but I'm getting fed up with the bullshit, so I'm considering going with Linux.

I assume Linux is capable of doing everything I need, which is primarily handling word documents, viewing PDFs, watching evidence videos, and online research. But my concern is that some of the more commonly used video types might have trouble on Linux, or that some of the word document templates I use in Windows might have compatibility issues.

I'm also nervous about using an OS I'm not familiar with for business purposes right away.

So I guess I'm asking a few questions. What is a reliable yet affordable option to get started? Are my concerns based in reality or is Linux going to be able to handle everything windows does without issues? What else might I need to know to use Linux comfortably from the get go? Is it going to take a lot of time and effort to get Linux running how I need it to?

For reference, I do consider myself to be somewhat tech-savvy. I don't code or anything, but I've built my last two home computers myself and I'm not scared of general software management, I just don't make it myself.

So, yeah, sell me on Linux, please.

[–] Sage_the_Lawyer@lemmy.world 16 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

But also:

Most veterinarians doubt the existence of a syndrome known as “whisker fatigue”, but it is important that pet owners understand the structure and function of cat whiskers, and that they treat their cats’ whiskers with respect. And, yes, it is possible that some cats have particularly sensitive whiskers.

It makes sense that good cat care includes observing cats’ eating habits carefully, and if they seem to be averse to eating from narrow, high-sided food bowls, perhaps owners should consider offering food in a different type of receptacle such as a “bowl for whisker relief”, and allowing them to drink from a water fountain, even if the theory behind this is highly debatable.

https://cats.com/whisker-fatigue

Seems while there may not be hard evidence, it can still be a preference for cats to have wider bowls.

[–] Sage_the_Lawyer@lemmy.world 30 points 10 months ago

I don't mean to be a downer here but... It sounds like she's just not right for you. To me it sounds like you've made efforts to try to improve and she hasn't. It takes two people working on a relationship to make it last.

While yes, communication is one key in a healthy and lasting relationship, the other key is mutual respect. Yes, you have to talk to each other, but just as important is having the respect to try and understand the other person's side and find a mutually acceptable resolution. It sounds like she doesn't respect you much, to me.

Granted, this isn't my relationship, and I'm sure I'm only seeing one negative aspect instead of the full picture, so don't take my words as definitive. But, I stand by this: if you don't feel respected, the relationship either isn't going to last, or it will and you will be miserable.

[–] Sage_the_Lawyer@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago

Unchecked capitalism, to put it simply.

[–] Sage_the_Lawyer@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If you really don't want to watch the movie, I'd say at least give the book a shot.

Imo, and at the risk of sounding cliche, the book is better.

[–] Sage_the_Lawyer@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ha, word for word the comment I wanted to make. Mangoes are truly S tier.

And they allegedly (couldn't find any real scientific studies, but tons of results like this) have an added benefit too, for any marijuana enthusiasts who may be around. https://autoflowering-cannabis.com/does-mango-make-you-higher/

[–] Sage_the_Lawyer@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I mentioned this further down the thread, but Scrubs is full of micro aggressions.

I mean, pretty much the very first joke in the series is JD asking Turk if he's allowed to say the N word.

There's an episode where the theme is whether Turk is black.

As for trans-specific problems, Todd advertises his website with the T slur in it on his T-shirt one episode.

He's also a prime example of bi-erasure as when he "comes out," nobody says bi the whole episode, and it's like the whole cast can't conceive of someone liking both men and women. Not to mention the bi stereotype that we're all sexual deviants and overly promiscuous.

Frankly, I could go on for a while. Scrubs was fine for its time. It does not hold up well. Shame because it was my favorite show for a very long time. But I'm glad society has grown.

[–] Sage_the_Lawyer@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Hmm. I'm annoyed at my lawyer brain, all I can think about is how this would actually be a very interesting case. At least, based on my understanding of U.S. Torts law, which is not my practice area (but which is bar tested and a required law scool course). Don't take any of this as real legal advice.

But, there's a concept known as the eggshell plaintiff rule/doctrine. Basically, it states that if the person you injured is unusually fragile, you're on the hook for their injuries regardless of whether they're a typical result of the action you took. So, here, while the typical result of pulling a finger would be a fart, the puller may be on the hook for the entire damages of a lost arm.

However, undercutting that is the defense of consent. The "victim" here clearly consented to the activity which led to the injury, and should have known that the action may likely result in the loss of an arm, based on the lack of tendons/muscles/skin/everything.

I'm gonna have to save this to show at conventions and see how people think this would play out. I'll totally be the coolest kid in school then. In your face, Mark.

[–] Sage_the_Lawyer@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I don't get it. The rogue wanted the wizard to cast a spell. As a seasoned wizard player, I can say with certainty that fireball is our only spell. Rogue knew exactly what he asked for.

[–] Sage_the_Lawyer@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Seems like it's time to brush up on your spell work then.

view more: ‹ prev next ›