Senal

joined 2 years ago
[–] Senal@programming.dev 6 points 2 months ago

that's a dictionary definition , top tier cherry picking though, congrats.

[–] Senal@programming.dev 16 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Spotify paid ridiculous sums of money, specifically to get Joe Rogan.

They absolutely do not care about complaints about tate.

Not to say you shouldn't try, you should, just that it's screaming into the void until the monetary price of continuing support is greater than at least some combination of sunk cost + potential profit. ( so $250m + whatever their profit projections are ).

[–] Senal@programming.dev 6 points 2 months ago

The differences here are that ORM and web frameworks weren't actively making the job harder and the sheer surface area of the problem.

If you fuck up with a framework or an ORM, it generally just fails to work, the magic internals might not be super helpful with their error messages, but such is the nature of the tradeoffs.

If you fuck up with an LLM you get something that generally compiles and looks like it should work, that's much more of a problem for both you and anyone who then needs to go trawling through, looking for the issues.

[–] Senal@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago

Are actions gold now, last i looked they were still a bit shonky?

[–] Senal@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago

Plex is a solid meh/10 back end wise, provided you have the knowledge to run the docker container it's not that bad.

Running it standalone is potentially effort.

My main issue with plex is it's transition into enshittification as a service.

[–] Senal@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago

i wasn't the person who replied to your first post.

The sentiment might have been somewhat clear, but the language indicated a misunderstanding of how much reliance there is upon society, which is what was called out (again, not by me).

You asked a question, i answered with my opinion also i look fabulous in my pointdexter pants, i even have the matching pocket protector.

[–] Senal@programming.dev 3 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Lacks specificity, but the general sentiment is understood

[–] Senal@programming.dev 2 points 2 months ago

Parker from Leverage , even more so in Leverage: Redemption

[–] Senal@programming.dev 9 points 3 months ago

Same reasoning behind using DEI instead of the actual words that acronym represents.

[–] Senal@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago

Mental illness is never an excuse for doing shitty things.

It can be, someone having a psychotic episode ( that couldn't reasonably be prevented or mitigated ) that hurts the people around them has a legitimate excuse for the outcome.

Part of the actual definition of mental illness could broadly be interpreted as impairment or outright loss of reasoning and cognition.

It does require us to give them treatment to avoid harming others.

Agreed.

Though i'd say, provide the framework and access to treatment, but i think we mean the same thing.

It is dangerous to not broadly paint society as mentally I’ll.

That's a very subjective take, with very vague language and almost no value as a talking point without more specificity.

To be clear, i'm not expecting an essay or anything, i just can't really respond without more information about what you mean.

Look south of you. At least 30% of the US population is mentally ill, and they should all be given free treatment for this illness.

An interesting perspective, if somewhat US centric, i mostly agree.

None of which addresses my original criticism that the definition of mental illness isn't something that should be ascribed to " all 'terrorists' ", it means something relatively specific and terrorism isn't a good synonym.

[–] Senal@programming.dev 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Again, not what the definition of "mental illness" generally means.

Look up an actual definition or this

Can "terrorists" have mental illnesses?, sure.

Are all "terrorists" by definition mentally ill, doubtful.

Without even getting into the subjectiveness of the term "terrorist", lets take your example.

There are plenty of situations where you can end up with that point of view and not have a legitimate "mental illness", because that term means something relatively specific and isn't a good enough fit with which to broadly paint all members of a group.

Another example of why it doesn't fit is that there are plenty of people who are evil/bad/morally bankrupt (for whatever frame of reference you are using to determine such things) that shouldn't get to use mental illness as an excuse for doing shitty things.

[–] Senal@programming.dev 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Having never owned a one i can't say this with first-hand experience, but aren't the issues with the cybertruck more to do with core design fuck ups.

To the point they wouldn't really be considered "kinks" as much as critical design and safety flaws ?

view more: ‹ prev next ›