Uruanna

joined 2 years ago
[–] Uruanna@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

They're not all upper class, Joey starts as a small background / ad actor, Rachel and Phoebe do small jobs like waitress and massages - Phoebe living in the street as a kid comes up a few times. (well, Rachel is born rich but she starts the series getting cut off and left with nothing - after she dumps her dad's credit cards she had) An episode has Joey, Phoebe, Rachel point out that they're poor and often out of a job so they complain that they aren't nearly as loaded as Chandler, Ross, Monica, and they have a hard time keeping up with their lifestyle. Also confirming Chandler, Ross, Monica are indeed well off. Later, Joey gets a good acting role, Rachel has a good job, and Phoebe gets a good place at some point.

[–] Uruanna@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Are they all developers?

[–] Uruanna@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

In their action, not between their legs or their skin color?? You are misreading what I said.

[–] Uruanna@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

By this logic, insulting the person at all is denigrating all of humanity.

No??

[–] Uruanna@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

When you show transphobia, racism, mysoginy, homophobia, fatphobia, etc. you are not disrespecting the one person, you are denigrating an entire section of humanity - you are associating the harm this one person caused you to this one trait that a lot of other unrelated people share. And that's how it becomes a crutch for you to use against anyone you don't like, and then at some point, that's just what you are - racist, homophobic, mysoginist, etc. Even unconsciously, you start thinking that anyone who shares that trait risks doing the same things to you personally, that's just how it happens.

So no, you shouldn't throw around the N word or the F word or berate someone's gender because they are abusing you. Blame them for what they are doing to you, not for what they are. You don't owe your abuser respect, but this isn't disrespecting one person.

[–] Uruanna@lemmy.world 41 points 3 weeks ago

AIPAC doesn't leave a lot of names available.

[–] Uruanna@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

From this admin? Nah. It'll be stolen and given to, idk, Thiel or Vance or whoever, but not nationalized, just reprivatized.

[–] Uruanna@lemmy.world 35 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Shouldn't be incompatible with nationalizing SpaceX and Starlink. Just give it all to NASA, actually.

[–] Uruanna@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

"l'Europe est devenue une punchline pour des américains qui n'y sont jamais allé" oui, la France connait ça depuis 20 ans... (rien contre Lady Decade, elle est bien)

[–] Uruanna@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Consider that any of those other things that doesn't immediately kill you has a chance of knocking you overboard, unless you're in the middle of the deck. Doesn't even have to injure you.

[–] Uruanna@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

It's not specific to Judaism, any oral tradition relies on the length of a sentence and rhyming and repetitions to make sure you got the right phrasing. That's how you come up with poetry and alexandrine and all that, everyone uses it.

[–] Uruanna@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

The 50th anniversary had Tom Baker make a cameo as a future incarnation straight up telling 11 that he might "revisit some old favorite (faces)", then 12 subconsciously chose a face from someone he met in one of 10's episodes, and then 14 took 10's face again for a few episodes. So yes, they explicitly opened the gates for a previous actor of a different character to pick up the role (and even a former Doctor). I think there have also been some rumors coming and going about Jenna a couple times, ever since Clara pretended to be the Doctor in a couple of episodes.

view more: ‹ prev next ›