WalrusDragonOnABike

I don't think so. Seems like KTI was talking specifically about trans women being neurologically female (and neurology is part of biology). I'm talking about the rest of the body also being female.

Time to turn into a purple dragon!

Just not physically.

If we are gonna insist people have to be categorized into either biological male or female, a lot of trans women would most reasonably be placed into the female category and a lot of trans men into the male category.

Trans people change frequently are changing their biology to match their gender.

Seems like this is from people who (claim to have) demonstrated how it could be done on the hardware used in the election as part of their professional careers, are showing the data suggesting something like that was done, and are reaching out to officials to get a recount, which would be able to prove something was done to alter the results. Seems like demanding recounts is what should be done, just like in 2020.

2016 anomilies were differences between exit polls and results specifically in some swing states. Different anomoly. Not saying 2016 was definitely fraudulent, but seems worth double checking if you want to pretend to be a republic/democracy.

You could do vote totals for president vs vote totals for the next highest state-wide race (or break it down to more locally) without looking at the party those votes went to. It wouldn't prove that the huge number of bullet votes were specifically in favor of Trump, but at least would suggest some wrong-doing, even if the result of a recount lowers Harris votes.

Still, there's surely lots of other races where one candidate is clearly awful, yet bullet ballot rates are still <1%.

Maybe betacam?

We just need to create an army of like 10 Ash-like super-posters and we can break 10K comments!

Always funny looking back to when you thought trans people were cool, but you were unfortunately not cool enough to be trans.

Yes, but only if its pee pee related.