charonn0

joined 2 years ago
[–] charonn0@startrek.website 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

the hack contains “33 terabytes of juicy banking information containing Americans’ banking secrets.”

Smells like BS. The Federal Reserve doesn't maintain bank records for individual Americans.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago

Someone who is fired for good cause generally doesn't qualify. If they're fired without being at fault, or if they quit for a good reason, then that's different.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Again, it varies, but it's usually based on your earnings in the most recent quarter, and is usually funded by your most recent employer.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 10 points 1 year ago (5 children)

It's a state-run program, so it varies. Most states provide up to 26 weeks (6 months). No state provides fewer than 14 weeks.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This is why I appreciate the scene in Undiscovered Country where Kronos One glides into view, seeming to align itself to the Enterprise's orientation.

https://youtu.be/AkqZja1IBfk?t=129

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

I'm a professional in the industry.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago (7 children)

It's probably not an eviction notice, but a "comply or vacate" notice. Journalists often confuse "eviction notice", which is a court order, with the sort of formal written demand notices that tenants are entitled to receive.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 5 points 1 year ago

It will vary by state, but generally:

When only one of the two parties is unwilling to continue the employer-employee relationship, it is obvious who is the moving party. If employment was still available to the claimant and the claimant refused to continue working, then the claimant is the moving party. If the employer will not allow the claimant to continue work, even though the claimant wants to, then the employer is the moving party.

https://edd.ca.gov/en/uibdg/Voluntary_Quit_VQ_5/

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

A system being slow and inefficient makes defrauding that system similarly slow and inefficient. To affect an election run on paper ballots you have to somehow physically alter or insert thousands or millions of pieces of paper without being detected. This will mean spending large amounts of time and money and must necessarily involve numerous people.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 10 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Manual in person voting is not easily scammed on a scale that can swing an election. The slow, inefficient, in person, physical process is a security feature.

view more: ‹ prev next ›