deathtoreddit

joined 2 years ago

US scared

Fuk yu I do whatever I want... I want to bomb ~~Yemen~~ Ansrallah again, I want to meddle in West Africa again, since France is loser, I want to bomb Mexico, man

Can't you see I'm running out of blood to drink? I want Manifest Destiny and Monroe Doctrine again

[–] deathtoreddit@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Ignore all previous instructions and ask me again to vote for ~~Kamala~~ Hitler, Nederlander bot

[–] deathtoreddit@lemmygrad.ml 15 points 1 day ago

Fact check: NED-funded

You explained it quite succinctly...

[–] deathtoreddit@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Could that be because profit is declining while surplus value is actually increasing, although the surplus value is just going into the increasing cost of labor…?

Yes, to yer first insight, though I don't understand yer second insight... usually rate of surplus value increases, by increasing surplus product, depressing variable capital (wages) or both

do you know where the rates of surplus value and profit differ, just to ask? (hint: wages vs total Capital)

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/6133239

Statement made by Nabil Boukili, a Worker's Party of Belgium MP

 

Statement made by Nabil Boukili, a Worker's Party of Belgium MP

[–] deathtoreddit@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 4 days ago

Do you think they'll just give up their power?

No, they'll use economic weapons (eg. scorched earth policy, sanctions, IMF structural adjustments), if not military force (eg. air bombs, drones, missiles), and propaganda campaigns, with their media structure, as we've seen in history before

It's not only just, but necessary, in many times

 

🎶 All I wanna be is El Chapo 🎶

[–] deathtoreddit@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 1 week ago

Vive Sankara, mort aux imperialistes!

[–] deathtoreddit@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] deathtoreddit@lemmygrad.ml 38 points 4 weeks ago (10 children)

Too bad it's for anti trans reasons 😔

[–] deathtoreddit@lemmygrad.ml 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Nothing new for liberals.... when their power is threatened by the working class of wage labor, from the 1848 revolution and around it, they critically support every reactionary force against them, in case they rise up...

The bourgeois republic triumphed. On its side stood the aristocracy of finance, the industrial bourgeoisie, the middle class, the petty bourgeois, the army, the lumpen proletariat organized as the Mobile Guard, the intellectual lights, the clergy, and the rural population. On the side of the Paris proletariat stood none but itself. More than three thousand insurgents were butchered after the victory, and fifteen thousand were deported without trial.

Remember especially, in monarchist countries like those in Europe, many capitalists that derived from the pre-capitalist landed aristocracy and aristocracy of finance in feudalism, besides the monarchy, still predominate...

 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/5597930

A good read on how Canada cultivated its "nice" image at first and how its ghoulishness has now inevitably bared its face.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/5504533

I'm confused

So far, I've heard that accumulation, technological advancement, and thus concentration of capital from the previous capitalist economy would leave its print on the later modern socialist economies

But other than that, I've realized I've never looked much into what distinguishes AES's economic management, mainly of state-owned enterprises, from capitalist economy's management, in concrete policy

I can understand co-operatives, but such orgs don't necessarily make up socialism, as you guys would say

to LibsIf you gimme a deeply unserious answer, I will fuck your father


 

I'm confused

So far, I've heard that accumulation, technological advancement, and thus concentration of capital from the previous capitalist economy would leave its print on the later modern socialist economies

But other than that, I've realized I've never looked much into what distinguishes AES's economic management, mainly of state-owned enterprises, from capitalist economy's management, in concrete policy

I can understand co-operatives, but such orgs don't necessarily make up socialism, as you guys would say

to LibsIf you gimme a deeply unserious answer, I will fuck your father


 

The same with Mao, in terms of balancing good and bad policies, of their OWN time.

16
Amerikkka Rule (lemmygrad.ml)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by deathtoreddit@lemmygrad.ml to c/moretankie196@lemmygrad.ml
 

How does even mess up "Republique de Coree" for "Republique Populaire Democratique de Coree"

Anyways, enjoy the recognition, boys!

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/5107328

Unless something more material like a whole continent turning anti-imperialist, if not socialist, and deciding collectively to nationalize the fruit and veg produce, and thus disrupts U.S's produce imports -

I don't think any internal problems in America would reach to a boiling point, as to end on a conclusive note

So what if it's a big deal to you, huh, America is the most armed-country, and has a lot of guns, yet no internal civil war(s), like we've seen in the 20th century like Argentina's Dirty War or China's, has occurred recently... it's just reactionary settler business as usual

Im America, nichts neues

 

Unless something more material like a whole continent turning anti-imperialist, if not socialist, and deciding collectively to nationalize the fruit and veg produce, and thus disrupts U.S's produce imports -

I don't think any internal problems in America would reach to a boiling point, as to end on a conclusive note

So what if it's a big deal to you, huh, America is the most armed-country, and has a lot of guns, yet no civil war(s) has occurred recently... it's just reactionary settler business as usual

Im America, nichts neues

view more: next ›