ferristriangle
joined 4 years ago
I'm not suggesting that what you're speculating is impossible.
I'm suggesting your analysis is facile and uninteresting
They caught Luigi in toon town smh my head
Conspiracy theory in the sense that they are, in fact, conspiring lol
Consent manufacturing machine goes brrrrrr
No doubt, but I'm specifically referring to comment sections of news agency posts. I feel (very anecdotally) that it seemed like the reception was near universally positive in the immediate aftermath of the event and the day after, but checking the comments on newer posts from those same news media accounts today feels like a switch has flipped and the sentiments expressed are now much closer to a 50:50 positive to bootlicker ratio.
I don't know how accurate my observations are, and I partly posted this to see if others have noticed the same shift or if I am just extrapolating from too small of a sample size.
but it's cool as hell he killed that CEO and I'm not going to pretend that it wasn't cool
Absolutely no one is saying you can't do that
is he a revolutionary hero and communist icon for it? no, shut the fuck up that's not what anyone is trying to say
Some people were more or less trying to say this, and those people are who the mod statement was directed at.
I feel like a good 90% of the posts I've seen complaining about the mood statement need to learn the concept "not every post I read is addressing me personally."
Oh, I'm sure there is organic versions of these sentiments going around.
It's more that, anecdotally for me at least, in the immediate aftermath of this event and the day after, the reaction seemed to be near universally positive even on the news agency posts, with only a few bootlicker posts sprinkled in.
Whereas today, the ratio to positive reaction to bootlicker seemed a lot closer to 50:50. I know it's not exactly a rigorous measure, but if it was entirely organic sentiment I don't think there would be such a rapid shift (that I may or may not just be imagining)
You sure are doing the meme of responding to "I like pancakes" with "oh, so you hate waffles??"
Yeah, that's the idea. This hearing was not the murder trial, so evidence pertaining to guilt or innocence is unlikely to have been discussed since it was not relevant to the matter at hand.
Which, as you said, means we have to wait for the trial to know anything conclusively. But the fact that he only disputed the cash does not necessarily mean he is admitting to the rest of it.
It's me, I'm everyone