heggs_bayer

joined 3 months ago
[–] heggs_bayer@hexbear.net 3 points 15 hours ago

I believe REgon mixed up you and @Owl@hexbear.net.

[–] heggs_bayer@hexbear.net 11 points 17 hours ago

You clearly lack reading comprehension. The quoted text is not trying to draw some distinction between "defending" and "celebrating one's accomplishments" and say that the former is bad while the latter is fine. What it does do is point out that the common attack on socialism that accuses actually existing socialist states of being totalitarian hellholes and important historic socialist leaders of being dictators is a load of shit; using a consistent standard to compare them to their contemporaries would reveal that socialism accomplished many wonders starting from extremely difficult conditions and that most "democratic" leaders are far more monstrous than even the nastiest tales cooked up about Stalin and Mao.

Among what I just said and some other things, it makes a point that is very pertinent to this discussion: the characterization of tankies as "uncritically defending authoritarian regimes/dictators" (as asserted by the zine from the OP) and detesting literally all dissent regardless of what the content of that dissent might be (as you asserted) is also a load of shit that depends on treating socialist experiments as radioactive failures that are entirely bad and not worth defending. Tankies are perfectly capable of recognizing and criticizing the mistakes those experiments actually made; the commonly hurled criticisms are torn apart because they are factually wrong and made in bad faith.

[–] heggs_bayer@hexbear.net 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

SOI SOI SOI SOI SOI SOI SOI SOI SOI SOI SOI SOI

[–] heggs_bayer@hexbear.net 8 points 2 days ago

The refusal to accept right wing framing on this being called a bad thing makes me think this is a bit.

[–] heggs_bayer@hexbear.net 18 points 3 days ago

Wow, our current political system prevents us from getting someone who's third party elected for president, making our votes spoilers than can prevent one of the mainstream candidates from winning? No one I've ever encountered has brought that up before! WTF I'm pro Kdolf now! wowee /s

[–] heggs_bayer@hexbear.net 4 points 5 days ago

I liked it quite a bit. The combat system is easy enough to wrap your head around. Being able to see what your chances of hitting different enemies are before you move is a nice touch. I played on daring and the game felt a little too easy at points.

The story is good and the companion characters (and some other npcs) are compelling. The game has roughly 3 "alignments" that decisions can fall under that give perks for advancing them. I played as a heretic, for instance, and got an ability from that alignment that lets me massively boost a party members' stats for a few turns, but they fall prone afterwards.

Each character gets 2 classes as they advance. With that in mind the choices currently feel pretty limited.

The minigame Owlcat shoved into the game - ship combat - is actually pretty fun unlike in their Pathfinder games.

[–] heggs_bayer@hexbear.net 6 points 5 days ago (3 children)

I beat Warhammer 40k Rogue Trader finally. Now I'm doing a fash playthrough of Disco Elysium.

[–] heggs_bayer@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago

kelly Claudia De La Whos

[–] heggs_bayer@hexbear.net 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

kelly Chick or treat.

[–] heggs_bayer@hexbear.net 28 points 1 week ago

Why the fuck does Russia care what I think?

The evil Ruzzins are trying to undermine the integrity of our wholesome keanu chungus democracy. They want the cheeto in the White House because Putler is the cheeto's puppet master! /s

[–] heggs_bayer@hexbear.net 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Serious emoji potential.

 

People I know are sharing polymarket predictions about the presidential election, and just reading about how the predictions work sounds like the most capitalism-brained nonsense. Like, try reading this without shaking your head:

On Polymarket, you can buy and sell shares representing future event outcomes (i.e. "Will TikTok be banned in the U.S. this year?")

Shares in event outcomes are always priced between $0.00 and $1.00 USDC, and every pair of event outcomes (i.e. each pair of "YES" + "NO" shares) is fully collateralized by $1.00 USDC.

Shares are created when opposing sides come to an agreement on odds, such that the sum of what each side is willing to pay is equal to $1.00.

The shares representing the correct, final outcome are paid out $1.00 USDC each upon market resolution.

Unlike sportsbooks, you are not betting against "the house" – the counterparty to each trade is another Polymarket user. As such:

Shares can be sold before the event outcome is known_ (i.e. to lock in profits or cut losses)

There is no "house" to ban you for winning too much.

Thing is, I'm 3 stupid 5 explaining why this stuff sounds off. Am I just doing a liberalism by speaking without investigating more? Is this as BS as it comes off as to me?

 

I've basically lost all desire to socialize with people and improve myself. I've been seeing a therapist and taking various different psych meds for years and have basically made no improvement. All I want to do anymore is eat way too much junk food (I feel like my friends and family would judge me very hard if I went back to toking and drinking like I did before rehab), play video games, and lie down doomscrolling chapo.chat.

The worst part is I know I have a lot going for me in life and I have a negative number of excuses to be this way: I'm in a cushy overpaid computer toucher job with a promotion on the near horizon, I'm doing well in my education, I haven't had anything really bad happen to me in years, and even the things that have gone bad for me are incredibly mild at most - first world problems. Even when I do the occasional good thing like walking or not eating like complete garbage for a day, I'm incapable of actually feeling any sense of accomplishment.

Whenever I talk to any of my mental healthcare providers about it, their advice basically boils down to "let yourself feel good about good things". There's also the more actionable advice, like use a sun lamp to make up for lack of sunlight and make some time to write my thoughts down every day, but I suck about following through on them. Trying to make myself feel good beyond split-second dopamine hits from base activities like stuffing my hamplanet pie hole with empty calorie laden garbage feels like trying to draw blood from a stone.

Often times I find myself thinking that maybe people like OrganizeOrDie are right. Depression is no excuse to stay out of organizing (something I'm also shirking my responsibility to do, largely because I'm at an intersection of privilege where I benefit from capitalism and imperialism far more than I am harmed by it), let alone doing the barest minimum to keep myself healthy, all of which will at least increase my chances of not feeling like an soulless automoton all the time. I know that humans are social beings and that community is essential to being human, but my temperment makes it so I don't actually feel good from socializing - not even in a social anxiety or lack of social skills kind of way - so I stay in my room and continue to rot. I feel like I'm part of the problem and not part of the solution and that if I'm incapable of actually becoming better then I may as well just self-destruct in silence.

I've been depressed basically since I was a child - over 20 years at this point - and it's so ingrained in who I am that I don't know how to get rid of it, or if I even want to. People who want things work to make them a reality after all.

I'm not sure what I want or expect from this vent-post. I just hate that I am the way I am and have no will to change.

 

Mine is when a lib says that a socialist leader is filthy rich because le ebil dictator owns literally everything in the country.

 

In 8^th^ grade my social studies teacher showed The Notebook to the class to help teach us about WWII. The movie had less than 5 minutes of content about the war; the rest was only tangentially related at best because it was set in that time period.

 

Granted, its to prevent overcentralization of Lemmy and not related to their shit takes, but still sicko-laser

 

... then why was it called MakhnovshCHINA? PRC-emblem some-controversy anarxi deng-stoned chairman

 

Easily one of my favorite bits up there with confederate Stalin.

 

So fanum tax.

view more: next ›