You're not wrong, but the way you put it makes it sound a little bit too intentional, I think. It's not like the camera sees infrared light and makes a deliberate choice to display it as purple. The camera sensor has red, green and blue pixels, and it just so happens that these pixels are receptive to a wider range of the light spectrum than the human eye equivalent, including some infrared. Infrared light apparently triggers the pixels in roughly the same way that purple light does, and the sensor can't distinguish between infrared light and light that actually appears purple to humans, so that's why it shows up like that. It's just an accidental byproduct of how camera sensors work, and the budgetary decision to not include an infrared filter in the lens to prevent it from happening.
She's in all of the episodes, she's basically the second main character :) She also played a role in the recent hunger games prequel thingy, which was pretty good
How is USB-C worse than either of them
I think if we are going to support the idea of an open web, we need to be consistent about it.
Not convinced. This feels like the paradox of tolerance in slightly different shape.
Ist das ne ernsthafte Frage, oder willst du hier nur ne Diskussion über Feminismus und/oder trans-Rechte anzetteln?
All faces of a cube are square. The face visible in the picture is definitely not square. Thus, no matter what the non-visible parts of the blue shape look like, it's for sure not a cube.
Because the balls did often need cleaning, whereas I've never heard of the moose wheel needing it
Wait but why is Valve involved at all, then? Not like it's their fault that some people they have nothing to do with are building a game based on those APIs, so shouldn't Nintendo approach the developers of the port directly instead?
That's a weird takeaway from this. I rather took it as a reminder that even in our own solar system, there's still surprises waiting for us, and there's so much more to explore. Doesn't take away from the wonder at all for me.
The thing is, movement is relative. Everything on earth is constantly in motion if you're observing from any other celestial body, so motion itself can't be what breaks portals. What it might be, though, is acceleration. Those panels in the video seem to be moving at a constant speed, so aren't experiencing any substantial acceleration, making a portal on them possible
You can pass two 2d ovals through each other in a 3D space no problem if they're exactly the same size.
Except it'd be much less of a practical problem if the question "but who gets paid" would be taken out distributing excess energy.