maysaloon

joined 2 years ago
[–] maysaloon@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 month ago

It is really nice to read your comment comrade, I really appreciate it. I hope to see peace and prosperity for our peoples one day ❤️

[–] maysaloon@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 1 month ago

The Ba'ath did not exactly fail the people, it just lost (similar to how soviet union just "lost"). We could argue that Bashar himself failed Syrians, especially in the 2019-2025 period. But by then, he was as far from Ba'ath as was Gorbachev from Communist party.

To add, in mid 20th century, communist parties in Syria and much of the Arab world were unconditional followers of USSR and influential foreign communist parties, even in matters that like the early support of Israel, or the French communist party supporting the french occupation of Syria. The Ba'ath party emerged instead as an Arab implementation of socialism, where Arab liberation was centered, and dependence or blind following of foreign bodies was rejected. It was only opposed to Communism in that sense. If you look at the Ba'ath congress of 1966, you'll see it was even more revolutionary than the communists.

[–] maysaloon@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

it depends what you mean exactly by less oppressive. Do you mean of minority ethnic and religious groups ?

Why things are going bad, I don't think there is one single comprehensive answer. The closest is probably that the country has undergone a devastating and long war for 14 years, and many of the events of this war had sectarian elements which agitated sectarianism in the population. That's the closest thing to factual I can give.

My own analysis is that the imperial core saw the agitation of sectarian violence as the best way to "disable" syria (in the sense of disabling its struggle against israel and other imperialist aims), similar to how they did Iraq and Lebanon, and I think a lot of sectarian propaganda probably came in with foreign funding. But that's just my own reading.

Sectarian propaganda combined with war leads to sectarian interpretations of the war and hence agitations. Sectarian violence only leads to more sectarian violence, agitating the other side, and it is just a runaway effect from there.

 

Sorry for posting this here, I don't know a better place. I feel very sick watching the events in my country unveil. Sectarian tensions have been bad for a while, but in a matter of one week, so many of my people have decided that the druze minority is their enemy, and that "liberating" their towns (from their own people!) is their righteous conquest.

I am very saddened about where things have gone. Things just keep getting worse and I see no way out. A small protest in damascus against the violence was attacked by mobs, without any government protection or presence whatsoever (the protest was next to the "parliament" building!). We are living in fascism, where speaking out against sectarian violence is punishable my mob beatings.

I apologize for the rant. I understand probably none of you here is syrian or even middle eastern, so please feel free to ask questions and I will happily answer. At this point this is my only outlet.

[–] maysaloon@lemmygrad.ml 15 points 3 months ago

Doesn't matter. Banks are evil but forced on us by capitalism. There's no ethical bank afaik. They wouldn't survive competition.

[–] maysaloon@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

What does pro-Assad mean? Are they coordinating with him? They wanna put him back in power? What's your proof?

Or you mean they simply like him?

it doesn't seem like this is just them suddenly deciding to stop the "extra judicial murders"

It's not sudden. This isn't the first act of resistance, but this is the most organized we've seen. They have been complaining for months about these killings.

There's certainly enough alawites armed or military trained to do this. They're more military trained than any other group ever since the French occupation days.

[–] maysaloon@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Being organized doesn't justify the falsehoods in the reporting. They've been getting murdered for 3 months now, surely they had enough time to organize.

[–] maysaloon@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 6 months ago (6 children)

Thanks for pasting excerpts from Wikipedia and confirming what I said, but what exactly is your point now? How does this relate to this group being an assadist group and not alawites putting an end to the daily murders of their people?

I would appreciate if you lead with your point / argument then justify it.

[–] maysaloon@lemmygrad.ml 23 points 6 months ago

They want to justify killing them more. Depressing.

[–] maysaloon@lemmygrad.ml 22 points 6 months ago (8 children)

You're speaking about Ibrahim houija. That guy was head of air force intelligence in the 80's and 90's. Do research before believing propaganda.

[–] maysaloon@lemmygrad.ml 40 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (15 children)

They're not Assad linked. They're fighting against the almost daily extra judicial murders and violence against the alawite minority in the coast.

Assad is gone.

[–] maysaloon@lemmygrad.ml 21 points 9 months ago

They're not lying. This is outdated info. Government already announced hama has fallen to HTS.

[–] maysaloon@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 11 months ago

You know you're white your country has an official Twitter account for drama posting.

21
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by maysaloon@lemmygrad.ml to c/asklemmygrad@lemmygrad.ml
 

I know this question will sound silly to some, but suppose a group of people in a low key third world country decide to make their own commune. They work together to build up farming and industry purely based on their own need, and slowly expand to accomodate their needs.

I understand Communes are viewed as ineffective, but a commune like this would be meant to grow, not just remain isolated. It would inspire communes in other areas, and it would aim to expand.

I see a couple of issues with this:

  • not all countries can do this. For example, Palestinians living in Palestine will suffer trying to do this. But most countries can, right?
  • it will only benefit the tiny group of people within proximity to the commune. But the commune can 1) expand and 2) inspire communes in other locations
  • some needs are hard for a small commune to make, such as computer chip manufacturing, and other things they will need to get from the non commune world

But still, I can't see this as less than a good step forward?

1
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by maysaloon@lemmygrad.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
 

It seems there are a lot of propaganda arising on certain lemmy instances parroting propaganda that lemmygrad and Communists support human rights violations, and equating Communists to the alt right.

This is an extremely ridiculous assertion, given the historical context of the left being the main force fighting Nazism and fascism. But I write this post as there are probably many people misled by all the dishonest propaganda out there, who may be accepting of reason before seeking to silence us.

Please link this post in other instances if they are parroting propaganda about Communists to justify demonizing us. Reasonable people will understand and oppose these motions.

What is NOT Communism? in short, communism is NOT:

  • "when the government does stuff"
  • "capitalism but everyone gets paid the same"
  • an incursion on personal freedom, or forcing people to do what they don't want (unless the thing they don't want is not exploiting others and not wishing mass murder on ethnic groups, etc).

Then what is communism? in simple terms, it is the belief that the working class (i.e. the people, the masses) must own the means of production (factories, work places, etc) and control the direction of production in society, so that we produce for our own needs rather than to fulfill profits.

Why? we spend most of our lifetime working, so why should we cater it towards profits of a minority class of capitalists rather than our own and out community's needs and wants? Why shouldn't we be masters of our own destinies?

You may not agree with this, but this is not an excuse to silence us or lump us with genocidal ideologies

This thread is not meant to convince you with communism, but to demystify it and break the cold war era propaganda that some of you continue to parrot.

you support USSR? What about their human rights violations? (applies to Cuba, China, etc)

We do, but we do not support human rights violations as we believe there are tons of propaganda surrounding this. Equating this with Nazism is EXTREMELY DISINGENUOUS. The prevailing propaganda against the USSR is even acknowledged by NATO countries themselves. Nazism is an ideology founded on genocide, and this is easy to verify from Hitler's writing himself.

Maybe in the end, we are wrong and despite the propaganda, there are human rights violations. But our support for the USSR comes from their achievements to better the human condition, and we hope to build on it. There are no human rights violation that inspires our ideology like it does for fascism or Nazism.

Disclaimer: I am just a random Communist. I have no authority over lemmygrad or connections to the admins, just to make sure I don't upset the admins saying this.

view more: next ›