nthavoc

Look at this guy! Living in a place with 4 walls!

IT'S A MINERAL!

I agree with your statement. However, the left also includes billionaires just like the right includes the working class. Left vs. Right helps billionaires survive by keeping the left and the right fighting and the focus off them. There are two pieces two this puzzle. Once these two sides amongst the "common people" stop fighting and agree that no billionaires should be in any control, I am willing to bet a change can be made in a positive direction, regardless if you believe in philosophical ideals. We can both agree that billionaires are bad for a society due to the concentration of accumulated wealth and the ability to shape social policy through money.

So says the key ingredient to this shit sandwich served up to the American people.

They're not rebuilding anything. They're just adding back doors everywhere. If anyone hasn't learned yet, these are crackpot script kiddies at best. Even If somehow control is take away from them, they are now going to definitely have to redo the entire thing to make sure none of their shit code survives.

Let's just agree to disagree. It helps if you don't start with a negative in every response and we're going in circles.

As long as you don't let too much magic smoke escape.

I've lost the bleeps, the sweeps, and the creeps!

Since you have time to ponder philosophical ideals, why not come up with a new system that does what you describe and prevents, if not mitigate, tribal mentality? Bear in mind you've only been describing wealth distribution. You still have to decide if you want this system you come up with to exist under a variation of Democracy, a monarch, an oligarch, or something completely new that won't cripple your newly designed system of wealth distribution. Then you need to decide which "tribe" gets to run it without upsetting the other "tribes" . And here we are again getting the red tribe and the blue tribe to come to their senses and agree to something that doesn't screw the rest of us.

From the article: Of course, it's not a tool designed to replace medical professionals but to be used in collaboration with cancer specialists to accurately spot the disease and then monitor how successful treatment has been. What's more, this kind of model is a much more rapid, accessible and affordable way to diagnose cancers.

This is the key difference and how AI should be used. It doesn't replace the human but effectively aids them in their research. The whole "outperfoming doctors" pitch needs to change to "Reducing critical misses for doctors." Otherwise it gets roped into the ChatGPT-like AI's which are absolutely garbage for decision making.

You keep bringing this back to capitalism. It's greed. The answer is greed. Even in your communist paradise, greed ruins it. Even in a socialist utopia, greed will be there to remind you of the inherent evil that is ingrained in humanity. Focus on the greed and maybe you'll make more allies instead of blaming a social concept.

You can unite, focus, make friends, form groups at the peaceful protests going on right now. The people are doing something. The perception I am getting is two people already in positions of influence trying to make changes, making money hand over fist doing these things, and getting screwed again by people like Schumer and Pelosi. Heart's in the right place, method needs to change.