Except the first assumption that e^x = its own integral, everything else actually makes sense (except the DX are in the wrong powers). You simply treat the "1" and "integral dx" as operators, formally functions from R^R into R^R and "(0)" as calculating the value of the operator on a constant-valued function 0. EDIT: the step 1/(1-integral) = the limit of a certain series is slightly dubious, but I believe it can be formally proven as well. EDIT 2: I was proven wrong, read the comments
pankuleczkapl
joined 2 years ago
As if Chinese phones didn't have backdoors already
It might be illegal in your country, but you can consider generating a person's face (and details) and creating a fake ID photo using it to protect your identity.
It would appear this is the simplest solution: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=102134
If you take a closer look, they are actually quite spacious
Because it pumps heat from inside to the back, so if the back is blocked it will struggle to pump heat into that tiny overheated space
1337x dot to for example
(that's the joke)
As long as you don't use them, sure. They are composed of basic parts, just well adjusted to the purpose. But if you do decide do use them, be aware that you cannot interfere with any radio communications in any way and/or destroy someone's property. Which does not mean I am against shooting down someone's drone on your property that is spying you, it's just not really legal per se.
Regret or self-hate can just as well turn into driving factors to continue doing harm to others. When you are mentally ill, logic starts completely bending and finally making a 180 degrees turn from normal
Niche? Are you a lunatic? The 3D printing industry is one of the fastest growing fields in the world. 3D printing is getting cheaper and cheaper compared to eg. CNC machining. The industry is a very important one, because it allows you to create accurate parts much more quickly that to drill a block of metal. And all this not even mentioning that this required mostly general computer science skill, I hope you won't call the computer science field niche?
After careful consideration I have come to the conclusion that the inverse of the operator L is obviously not 1/L and you are absolutely right. This derivation is complete nonsense, my apologies. In fact no such inverse can even exist for the operator 1 - integral, as this function is not an injection.