quarrk

joined 3 years ago
[–] quarrk@hexbear.net 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

The Dems are effective only because of their perceived legitimacy. If they completely stop winning elections, then the public will look elsewhere: to either the Bernie/AOC types, or to MAGA. No one wants to follow a loser.

Money is necessary but insufficient for the DNC to effectively stifle opposition

[–] quarrk@hexbear.net 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Believe it or not but there are many people who would have voted for both Mamdani and Cuomo. They just would rank Cuomintang #1 because they’re sus of a brown person supporting Palestine, but they like Mamdani’s smile so they give him a #2 anyway.

Single choice elections give outsized influence on single issues and make it easier to manipulate the discussion one way or another. All you have to do is build a narrative that Mamdani = bad economics, Mamdani = jihadist, etc. and suddenly his polling collapses even if nobody particularly dislikes him. People are less willing to take a chance if they feel like they can make only one selection.

[–] quarrk@hexbear.net 27 points 4 days ago (1 children)

rat-salute to:

  • Ambitious_Hand8325
  • Monkey_DDD_Luffy
  • Alarmed_Plant_9422
[–] quarrk@hexbear.net 31 points 4 days ago

I assumed it was someone from here

[–] quarrk@hexbear.net 63 points 4 days ago (3 children)

I made multiple comments and had a feeling they were invisible.

Yup, if I view the thread in an incognito tab, my comments don’t appear. Shadow banning, another reason Reddit is a dead end

[–] quarrk@hexbear.net 3 points 4 days ago (4 children)

A manifesto is a declaration of values, whether for an organization or an individual.

If an individual, then it is electoralism-brained, public preaching on the street corner to prove that one holds the most correct stances. Because in liberal democracy, your political power is reduced to mere enumeration of individual beliefs, rather than organized action. A manifesto of this kind centers the individual for little benefit to the broader working class, if any. The only time it might make sense to publish this kind of manifesto, then, is before some sort of adventurism which is ineffective and individualist for the same reasons.

If an organization, then a manifesto serves as a centralized place to declare the purpose of their concrete activism, as a means of recruitment.

[–] quarrk@hexbear.net 13 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Link

There’s also this one by John_Jack_Reed

[–] quarrk@hexbear.net 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Wouldn’t get your hopes up. But if someone here feels motivated to add a comment, I’ll upvote it

[–] quarrk@hexbear.net 18 points 4 days ago

NYC, the capital of Capital, would be a poetic start of socialism in the US if that were to happen

[–] quarrk@hexbear.net 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Better red than dead

[–] quarrk@hexbear.net 15 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

cool-dad and blushing-engels drafted the communist manifesto together and with feedback from a workers party. The purpose was to announce a movement and to attempt to coalesce a bunch of disparate socialist ideas under one banner.

Writing a manifesto in isolation from an organization a-guy is Jeopardy logic

[–] quarrk@hexbear.net 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)
 

I hear that there are power users not unlike Reddit mods. Does that make it impossible to meaningfully change the content on Wikipedia, or is it just difficult in small numbers?

Given the integration of Wikipedia into assistants like Siri and Google AI search, it seems that removing some of the Red Scare NAFO nonsense on English Wikipedia would be a worthwhile endeavor - even if one has to deal with frustrating power users fighting edits

 

That’s it

 

YouTube link

Meet Juan Carlos, the embodiment of the American dream. He came to this country with virtually nothing and now owns a car collection that includes a Ferrari F40, a Michael Schumacher kart, Insane sleepers, and limited-edition vehicles that can never be replaced. Tune in to see what he owns and how he got here.

Fortunately about half the comments are roasting the guy

 

You should assume that large employers are running your name through some software to see what things you’re posting online. You should at the very least think about public posts and comments under your legal name. Not sure what other services are out there, but I’m sure there are some that can dig deeper than that e.g. attempting to find social media not registered under your name but linked to a known email address. This is the consequence of your data being sold by the Fuckerbergs of the world.

 

In this explosive geopolitical debate, international relations scholar John Mearsheimer and historian Vijay Prashad go head-to-head over the rise of China, the South China Sea tensions, and U.S. foreign policy in Asia.

🔴 Mearsheimer argues that as China rises to superpower status, it will inevitably seek hegemony in Asia — pushing the United States to contain Beijing and secure its dominance.

🔵 Vijay Prashad fires back, saying the U.S. has no legitimate role in the South China Sea or Asia’s regional disputes. Asian countries — whether it's India, Japan, or Taiwan — are capable of handling their own borders. The American military presence is fueling conflict, not peace.

👉 Prashad also flips the narrative: Shouldn’t the U.S. solve its own territorial issues — from tensions with Canada, ambitions in Greenland, to control of the Panama Canal?

📌 Topics Covered:

  • China’s rise and regional hegemony
  • U.S. military presence in Asia
  • South China Sea dispute
  • India-China, Japan-China, and Taiwan-China tensions
  • Critique of U.S. imperialism

🔔 Subscribe for more critical debates on global power, imperialism, and the future of the international order.

31
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by quarrk@hexbear.net to c/videos@hexbear.net
 

Yes it’s Jubilee debate brained clickbait, but admittedly it is funny to watch JP get increasingly frustrated over nothing and his arguments spiral into meaninglessness

 

With thunderous applause?

 

Article

Finland's track gauge is changing: "We are starting from the north, and we have strong support from NATO," says Minister Lulu Ranne

The Nordic ministers issued a statement on military mobility between the countries.

Finland is preparing for a change in track gauge.

Finland is planning to switch to the European standard gauge. According to Transport Minister Lulu Rante, the government must make a national decision on changing the gauge by July 2027.

Changes to the track gauge would start north of Oulu.

The project is based on improving security of supply and military mobility, as well as developing cross-border connections to Sweden and Norway.

This is not just a Finnish issue, but a joint project of the whole of Europe and NATO, Ranne said at a press conference for the informal meeting of Nordic transport ministers in Helsinki.

According to Rante, now is the right time for Finland to join the standard width.

The need for funding is great, but the EU can support the planning by up to 50 percent and the construction by about 30 percent. However, implementation will not happen quickly. Work can start in the early 2030s at the earliest, Ranne emphasized.

– Of course, we are very pragmatic and realistic, we cannot do this in five years. We are planning until the end of the decade, and maybe in 2032 we can start construction.

Ministers gather to discuss transport from a military perspective

The transport ministers of Finland, Iceland, Norway, Sweden and Denmark met today in Helsinki.

The ministers issued a joint statement on military mobility and security of supply.

The Nordic transport ministers also agree that the planning of the national transport system must take into account preparedness, military mobility and security of supply, the ministers declared and assured their consensus.

According to it, "it is important to recognize" cross-border military movement.

– It is important for all of us that the Nordic countries cooperate, even when it comes to logistics-related matters, not only military but also civilian, Finnish Minister of Transport Lulu Ranne said at a press conference.

– The current geopolitical situation, together with Finland's and Sweden's NATO membership, further emphasizes the importance of comprehensive Nordic cooperation.

Ranne stated that the transportation sector is also the basis for military operations.

– If the transportation system is destroyed, then our military forces, our equipment, our defense forces cannot function. And protect us, defend us as they should.

Informal meeting on transport

The ministers also agree that preparedness, military mobility and security of supply should be taken into account in national transport system planning, in close cooperation with the defence authorities. The transport ministers also recognise the importance of regional Nordic cooperation and information sharing within the NATO context.

Russia's invasion of Ukraine has also increased cooperation between the Ministry of Transport.

The informal meeting of Nordic transport ministers focused on cooperation in transport system planning and maritime safety. The ministers discussed transport system cooperation, including from a preparedness perspective, and received an update on the European track gauge.

The ministers issued a joint statement. The statement highlights the importance of cross-border military mobility, civil preparedness and security of supply in both the Nordic transport system strategy and the countries' national transport system planning.

Tomorrow's talk about shadow fleets in the Baltic Sea

The informal meeting of transport ministers will continue tomorrow, Wednesday, May 14. The ministers will discuss maritime safety, including the shadow fleet.

 

I feel like this one is kind of a miss? A bit of revisionism to say that money has no relation at all with value. Marx is clear about this… gold is money because it has value. This is true simultaneously with money as a symbol detaching from its material form and the value relation. This symbolic form can only exist after mediation as value.

It’s like saying: the airplane does not interact with gravity because it does not fall to the ground. No — gravity is essential to the mechanism of flight.

view more: ‹ prev next ›