this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
94 points (99.0% liked)

news

23411 readers
637 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DefinitelyNotAPhone@hexbear.net 55 points 1 month ago (2 children)

As it turns out, a system where your best and brightest get paid jack shit after going insanely in debt to be there only to end up working for some underfunded research lab that's going to sell all their work to private capital to be gouged for profit or locked in a vault for all eternity isn't one that entices people to join it.

Who would've thunk?

[–] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

STEM people usually get paid to do their doctorates. It's just that it is far too tempting for most of them to stop at a bachelors and make money than pursue the higher education necessary to actually advance the field, particularly for engineers. However, the real thing is that China just has way the fuck more people, so even if there were, by percentage, statistically less people pursuing higher level education, the actual amount of people doing this research in China is staggering.

[–] Hexboare@hexbear.net 32 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

STEM people usually get paid to do their doctorates

Stipends are usually very low and criminally low when you compare to what someone would make if they didn't do a doctorate

To say nothing of the debt from their undergrad and grad degrees

[–] TreadOnMe@hexbear.net 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

True, still better than state of the humanities.

The real tragedy is once they get their doctorate there is more economic value for companies in paying them really well to do nearly nothing, something I have heard about happening all too frequently.

[–] Egon@hexbear.net 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

However, the real thing is that China just has way the fuck more people, so even if there were, by percentage, statistically less people pursuing higher level education, the actual amount of people doing this research in China is staggering.

Maybe it also has something to do with what the research labour goes into. The best and brightest in the west end up doing things like: Market research. Figure out how to sell more soda. Figure out how to make new variant of peanut butter. HR (protecting the company from any responsibility). Endless redundant work that is only done due to patents, copyright and IP laws. Figure out how to make iPhone thinner. Figure out how to bake more ads into the OS. Lawyerstuff most of which is also just handling bloat and redundancy.

When you look at what you can do with your degree (make money, be dissatisfied with your job) it's no wonder more and more people decide to look elsewhere. If all you can do is this, then you might as well choose a profession with a lower barrier of entry and (oftentimes) an equal or higher wage.

Like most anthropologists end up in marketing or HR. Same goes for sociologists. How many people aren't just spending their days making perfume? Make up? Paper work? There's exceedingly few options for doing things that "feel" like they matter, and if you get one, then the wage will probably be terrible.

Contrasted with China, which also has bloat and redundancy and pointless jobs, but it at least seems to also have avenues available for those that wish to use their education for something "important". That vibe will probably get more people into academia, which in turn will get more people into scientific research.
Not to mention that China actually invests in the infrastructure needed to have a robust foundation for research.

[–] newmou@hexbear.net 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

And in a capitalist system like the US, that blob of way the fuck more people would then get the wildly antiproductive backhand of free market dynamics and make the entire field unsustainable for everyone, leading to the same systemic issues and undercutting actual scientific research

[–] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I was at a crossroads in my grad school career. I was getting my MSc paid for and studying something important in STEM, but the future to go PhD looked like shit, as you say. literally, my only compelling rationale to get a PhD in the US was it would make--emigrating out of the US on a path to citizenship elsewhere--more feasible.

but I knew the US was failing a decade ago when I saw how aggressively China was courting young, English speaking academics on campuses to do their research and scholarship in China. I was in the middle of my own program, but considered doing it when I finished.

then I saw articles about how many young academics were leaving to do research in China on like NPR and next thing you know, the US government threatens to withhold any DoD grants from any research university that allows the organization hosting those recruitment opportunities on campus. and overnight those doors all shut with perfunctory apologies from university administration for terminating exchange programs.

I knew we were falling way behind before, but once the US schools shut their doors because the US threatened the DoD money laundering bag, I knew we were completely fucked.

[–] GlueBear@hexbear.net 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

You can still leave tho, I have a family friend who has a PhD. They have little to no issue getting around and getting visas. Getting out of the country is still feasible. I would get an engineering PhD or material science PhD and see if I can book it to China.

[–] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

yeah, the ability to leave easier wasn't worth the 5 more years in the shitty academy making poverty wages and being a serf for some careerist.

I chose to finish my MSc and work in environmental outreach and later government service, where the wage isn't sexy, but it pencils out for a simple life. I do not regret it, because now I have some formal education, broad experience and a few bucks in my pocket if I want to leave. cash in hand creates emigration opportunities too.

[–] GlueBear@hexbear.net 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That is true comrade, I'm happy for you. It sounds like you have a plan B for when shit hits the fan.

Yeah getting a PhD just to be able to leave isn't feasible at all. Still the route they chose.

[–] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago

yeah totally. it's a real move and I was on the fence for a while about it. in the end, it felt less risky for me materially and emotionally, lol. I have enough cynicism already.

[–] Evilphd666@hexbear.net 5 points 1 month ago

Distain for education and the arts is one of those hitler-detector boxes.