this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
598 points (96.3% liked)

Science Memes

10340 readers
1908 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.


Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HollowNaught@lemmy.world 54 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

I knew a guy when we were both in final year of a biomed bachelor. He was a creationist

Don't know how he went that long without finding something that challenges that viewpoint

[–] ReplicantBatty@lemmy.one 58 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm sure he found a shitload of stuff that challenged that viewpoint.

...and then proceeded to completely ignore it

[–] HollowNaught@lemmy.world 17 points 3 weeks ago

The sheer aptitude they had for ignoring information is commendable

They should become a politician

[–] SomeAmateur@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Like what kind? Believing in higher powers doesn't have to mean that you don't belive in evolution/natural adaptation taking place over time.

If it was "God made everything in a few earth days and nothing changed" then yeah I feel you

[–] tyler@programming.dev 17 points 3 weeks ago

Creationists believe the first. For example I’m Christian, but not a moron, so I don’t believe in creationism.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 5 points 3 weeks ago

They specifically said he was a creationist though. Not just that he believed in a higher power.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Two sets of facts for different purposes. Just like how we know that the stars are only a few miles away, but for the purpose of science they are millions of miles away. (/minitrue)

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

As long as the teacher understands their own lesson from the students work it doesn’t matter that the students doesn’t actually grasp what its about

[–] HollowNaught@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean, I'm in a medical course so... yes it does matter that students understand a fundamental concept all life is based on?

[–] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Of course, i am not disputing that and it also matters to me. But i don’t believe the system of education allows a teacher to accurately assess such without putting a great amount of personalization in for every student.

The skills required to pass education are not the same as those to get a good understanding and as a side effect we often have people severely lacking understanding biased by credentials in critical positions.

Large language models have pretty much proven this by being able to ace exams better then any human while being unable to reason or understand.

Are teachers even allowed to fail a student who has excellent scores on the argument they hold beliefs that are inconsistent with understanding the content matter?