this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
128 points (99.2% liked)

chapotraphouse

13445 readers
798 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bumpusoot@hexbear.net 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I don't really understand the issue people have with this. Sure it doesn't look like a particularly playable or fun game currently, but I do think it's an interesting PoC that explores different uses for current "AI". It's an idea people may likely build on.

[–] NuraShiny@hexbear.net 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Let me tell you some of them:

  • Energy use
  • Lack of game state past 3 seconds (the number the paper cites)
  • Energy use
  • The impossibility of implementing game state past 3 seconds without investing oodles of hours of coding work.
  • Energy use
[–] bumpusoot@hexbear.net 2 points 2 weeks ago

I didn't say it was a good game, I literally said it was an interesting PoC.

I understand the energy use objection though, how much energy did this use?

[–] RyanGosling@hexbear.net 2 points 2 weeks ago