this post was submitted on 31 Aug 2024
70 points (98.6% liked)
chat
8245 readers
470 users here now
Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.
As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.
Thank you and happy chatting!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
i mean it's the normal connection that every industry that employs young attractive people in a performance capacity has, which is that they are offered life changing sums of cash and gigs in exchange for sexual favors
Well yes but specifically, this particular controversy was about using some AI/fake child in an advertisement featuring sexualized clothes
Never mind. It was a real child.
So, for everyone being aware of the pictures:
https://firstclasse.com.my/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/balenciaga-controversy-2.png
I don't think the kids are being sexualized, and how I read it, it looks more like a critique of the use of ever younger models on the fashion industry.
oh shit lmao was that it? i'll be honest if this makes you mad you are a rightist like it would not take much to convince you that we need to end pride parades and drag queen story hour.
For real, like compare it with this:
https://beautyramp.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/07/child_beauty_pageants_1wnfe.jpg
And tell me who is the one sexualizing little kids?