this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
0 points (NaN% liked)

chapotraphouse

13524 readers
964 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Privatizing the US national helium reserve. Gonna laugh when in a few years the government of another nation ends up owning it. Helium is dwindling finite resource that key technological infrastructure relies upon.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tachanka@hexbear.net 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Russia has been fascist since it was feudal

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That's despotism and not feudalism.

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Despotism is not a useful political term at all and feudalism is a very specific form of a much broader economic system that was used in the middle ages. You have nonides what you're talking about.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

According to my knowledge it is just as useful a term as feudalism, describing a specific system.

You have nonides what you’re talking about.

Buddy, you are a communist , a flatearther from economics, an etherium proponent from economics, a homeopathic doctor from economics.

And what you wrote is illiterate bullshit. Listen for once what people who are not from your sect say on things.

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 0 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Despotism refers to a person in power making unilateral decisions, it is no means of describing any system of government.

Define communism, I'll let you once again look it up.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.zip 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Despotism refers to a person in power making unilateral decisions,

Yeah, that too, so?

it is no means of describing any system of government.

Why is that?

Define communism, I’ll let you once again look it up.

Why would I? That wouldn't change that I'm right. You seem to think that I have to prove something or dispute something with you to be right. I don't.

Also a hint - anybody can come up with any kind of definition. If I look it up, then what? Somebody you consider authoritative has approved a definition? Well, it's one model you like, I may not, so why would I bother?

[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 1 points 9 months ago

It's because I'm trying to bait funny posts from you. It's working. I've literally met mollusks smarter than you