this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
1056 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

59605 readers
3156 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jonne@infosec.pub 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Yeah, there's going to be hilariously bad outages at AWS within like a year.

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah... I didn't choose it, but some of the services from my employer run there. May be a good time to make some moves, we'll see.

Not really going to be an issue I can fix obviously, but I'll be making even more backups than normal....

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

good time to make some moves

To where? Google? Azure? There's a reason we call them Frugal and Unsure at my side job. If AWS sucks in the next year, that'll barely bring it down to their level. Hell, if AWS sucks ALL NEXT YEAR with a clown-car style outage every week, then maybe.

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago

Considering our use is not to the general public, we'd be better off with an entirely different strategy.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why? Amazon seems to have built an amazing system with AWS, but does it need the same amount of staff time to maintain it that it needed to develop it?

If Amazon acknowledges that it isn't going to be developing new products to the scale it did for the past decade, it probably doesn't need the headcount it had before.

[–] AliasVortex@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Enh, the tech space is very much innovate or die. So yeah, they could probably throw everything in maintenance mode and make a reduced headcount work, but if AWS goes stagnant it's entirely likely that Amazon goes the way of IBM and Motorol. Especially when someone (likely, Microsoft or Google) comes to take a slice of the AWS market share.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 month ago

the tech space is very much innovate or die

Is it still? The VC funding has started drying up and every tech company has started worrying about profitability now. I think the old innovate or die mantra has played itself out.

And IBM & Motorola diminished in part because they stuck to older industries where cost became as important as innovation and didn't lower their cost.