this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
1056 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

59605 readers
3361 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] omarfw@lemmy.world 309 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Now they can replace them without paying unemployment and pay the new workers a lower wage. This is what they wanted to happen. Mega corporations are a problem we need to solve as a society.

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 128 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Quality programmers are a finite resource. Amazon chewed through the entire unskilled labor market with their warehouses and then struggled to find employees to meet their labor needs. If they try the same stunt with skilled labor they're in for a very rude awakening. They'll be able to find people, but only for well above market rates. They're highly likely to find in the long run it would have been much cheaper to hang onto the people they already had.

[–] omarfw@lemmy.world 99 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The whole problem with companies like Amazon is that hardly anyone in charge of them seems to care about long term sustainability. They all just invest enough effort to squeeze out some short term profits, earn their bonuses and then leave for another company to do it all again. Nobody is interested in sustainability because there is no incentive to. They're playing hot potato with the collapse of the company.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

Now expand that to the entire planetary economy. Unsustainable short term gains is the entire industrial revolution.

We're only 300 years in and most life and ecosystems on Earth have been destroyed and homogenized to service humanity. We're essentially a parasite. It's not surprising that the most successful corporations are the most successful parasites. It's just parasites, doing parasitic things, because they're parasites... from the top down.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] greenskye@lemm.ee 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's the next executive's problem. These executives will jump ship with their golden parachutes before any of that affects them.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] eee@lemm.ee 43 points 1 month ago (1 children)

yeah, the only problem is that this results in the best talent leaving, you're stuck with people who have nowhere else to go. it's one of those short-term profits kinda things, which is why Wall St loves it so much.

[–] mrspaz@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheFunkyMonk@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I thought the same. Interesting strategy cutting the people who are good enough to get another job.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 20 points 1 month ago (4 children)

And they want people off the vesting ramp as early as possible.

Amazon does 5-15-40-40

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 255 points 1 month ago (18 children)

5 day RTO is a stealth layoff. This is a feature, not a bug.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 101 points 1 month ago (4 children)

It's like reverse stack ranking. They'll be left with the people that couldn't find another job.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 48 points 1 month ago (1 children)

and the people who know exactly how to waste time in an office.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 26 points 1 month ago (2 children)

That's literally what we all do in office. Just sit ans chat. It's country club. Productivity went up during covid.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

A.k.a. Twitter and the elon filtering moment

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 39 points 1 month ago

Yep this has been the modus operandi for businesses who want to reduce workforce without having to pay for layoffs.

[–] Stupidmanager@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Like many companies, they overhired in the last 4 years. Some of these people are due years of severance (my offer listed 2months for every year after 1 year), not to mention the vested stocks and other bonuses granted during this insane hot hire period.

So how do you remove people not loyal to the company? The most hated mandate ever. Amazon is a company that doesn’t need people in the office. This is nothing more than screwing people over.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 116 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Amazing.

They order people to work in different offices than before, far away from before, or in offices that did not even exist before. They order people to work in offices who have only worked at home before.

And they call it "return", and everybody seems to accept the audacity.

Nobody laughs out loud into their faces and calls them the dirty liars that they are.

[–] 1984 19 points 1 month ago

Because people who suck their tits need their milk.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] GhiLA@sh.itjust.works 103 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just as planned - Amazon Execs who aren't planning to rehire them anyway.

They do this shit to cull you.

[–] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 75 points 1 month ago (6 children)

It's sort of a strange approach, because this will leave you with the workers who can't find employment elsewhere.

[–] chakan2@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Exactly...they won't be picky about raises or working conditions.

[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago

Most companies are satisfied with adequate workers rather than diligent and empowered workers. The latter cost too much. This is a convenient way for Amazon to cull the crew without incurring bad PR. This is why it’s often a shitshow in offices and warehouses; because the workers with self esteem and motivation either get fed up and leave or are forced out. This is just a facet of Big Capitalism.

[–] exanime@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

By the time that negative effect kicks in, the execs already cashed in their bonuses and are on their way out of the sinking ship

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 102 points 1 month ago (4 children)

That was probably the intent. It works as a soft layoff. Do something wildly unpopular, knowing that a bunch of employees will quit. The ones left will pick up the slack, because obviously if they had anywhere else to go they would’ve left with the first group.

[–] jewbacca117@lemmy.world 83 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Seems like a great way to lose all your talented employees

[–] Confused_Emus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Unfortunately a dollar in cut costs is more valuable than employee talent these days.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 85 points 1 month ago (12 children)

I really do wonder if Amazon will run out of people willing to work for them someday. Their approach assumes there is an infinite supply of workers to burn through. Given everything I’ve witnessed from the company, I’d never work there. Do they at some point poison the labor pool against them?

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We're constantly producing new people that don't know any better

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] EnderMB@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago (9 children)

When I joined Amazon, I was told that for some roles in the US Amazon received more applications than corporate employees worldwide - so I assume 1M+.

That number has probably reduced significantly, given we've now had two rounds of RTO. I know some recruiters are really struggling to find external candidates to join, and rightly so, but I don't doubt that Amazon can find someone to fill these roles, or can find someone outside of North America or Europe to take that role.

The FAANG acronym was the worst thing to happen to tech, because people will flock to Amazon to say "I worked for FAANG". Prestige is a powerful thing to some, and they'll deal with some insane shit for the clout that comes from being here.

(FWIW, I've been at Amazon as a software engineer for close to four years now, and I've noticed zero improvement in opportunities afforded to me)

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] daddy32@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago (4 children)

You could also think this applies to all corporations in some degree. But no, there's a fresh batch of bright eyed optimistic people out of school every year.

[–] BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world 32 points 1 month ago

You could also think this applies to all corporations in some degree. But no, there's a fresh batch of ~~bright eyed optimistic people out of school~~ people desperate to not be homeless or starve every year.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 84 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If it's anything like my work and their RTO a few things.

  1. hR is well aware of attrition rates and I bet they're through the roof
  2. Any new hires are probably not the best or brightest they could expect to hire

So expect quality at Amazon to decline. It may not be outwardly visible but mark my words for those that are still there it will devolve into a chaotic shit show of overworked employees that are left backfilling work for those who left and the incompetence that came in.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 28 points 1 month ago

expect quality at Amazon to decline.

They'll have to dig a new basement for it to get any lower.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I canceled my Prime membership earlier this year because of that decline in quality. I wish everyone could, but thanks to the loss of retail throughout the country many can't afford not to have it.

[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Prime is not a money saver. It's a money waster that tricks you into buying more stuff just because "the shipping is free" but you can often get free shipping without Prime or Amazon. Just wait until you need enough stuff to meet the store's free shipping threshold to make an order.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 month ago (8 children)

I have a feeling the big impact is going to be in other services, namely AWS. Makes me wonder if some new global outages are coming, which are always fun to deal with.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 49 points 1 month ago (23 children)

I know some tech workers who really want to return to office full time along with everyone else. They miss the old way. It’s not everyone, and it’s definitely not me, but it’s a legitimate position. I guess now they know where they can go.

[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 44 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I honestly don't see an issue with the people going back to the office because they want to work from there. I just want others to stop trying to force me to do the same.

This sort of thing seems to have always been a plague with a set of the extroverted sort. They seem to feel the whole world should for whatever reason cater to what makes them happy and us introverted types that do not like the social activities that they do should be made to partake anyway. For our own good. Yet the world is ending when those same extroverted people have to spend a large chunk of time alone or simply being quiet.

The older I get the less patience I have for those sorts of games. Which could become an issue for me professionally I suppose.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
[–] VantaBrandon@lemmy.world 43 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] SirEDCaLot 30 points 1 month ago (7 children)

That and executive ass covering, a way to avoid admitting to shareholders that they wasted their money on useless commercial real estate.

It's also shooting themselves in the foot. The first people to leave aren't going to be the clock punchers, it will be the best and brightest who can easily find other jobs.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] vga@sopuli.xyz 34 points 1 month ago

That might've been the plan all along.

[–] sjh@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Wow, it seems like the return-to-office mandate is causing quite the shake-up! Totally get why folks are jumping ship - flexibility has become such a big deal, especially after getting used to working from home. I read that 65% of workers now say they'd consider quitting if they couldn't work remotely! It's all about finding that work-life balance in a job that respects our needs. Hang in there, tech friends—plenty of companies out there understand the power of flexibility and trust!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

pop culture stock picker Jim Cramer points while looking cranky

That's a sell cue, for any shareholders reading along.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago

Nah, the shareholders love this shit.

I mean, most of them. Please ignore my piles of AMZN.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

To literally no one’s surprise, least of all the leadership at Amazon. No unemployment when you quit.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago (8 children)

The problem being that the ones moving on to other jobs are the actual talent. Unlike a targeted layoff, this leaves Amazon with the employees no one else wanted.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›