this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
562 points (97.8% liked)

Technology

59656 readers
2707 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Good news but it'll be a while before I can replace the 20TB drives in my NAS with these.

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

It's looking like 2029 will be the turning point. Right now, we are on the verge of having 16tb m.2s on the market, and by 2029 SSDs will be around $10-15/TB like HDDs are now.

In 2029, if semiconductor trends continue, it is likely that we will have 16TB SSDs for ~$200 and 32TB SSDs for ~$500; Cheaper than the $320 we're paying for 20TB HDDs right now.

https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/ssds/16tb-m2-ssds-will-soon-grace-the-market

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_hard_disk_drives#/media/File:Historical_cost_of_computer_memory_and_storage.svg

The HDD industry doesn't seem like it will improve at the same rate. It is likely that the SSD market will have better $/TB than the HDD market in 2029, unless hard drives make some massive breakthrough before then. The survival of the HDD industry past the next 5 years is basically riding on Seagate's ability to successfully release HAMR technology.

[–] Creat@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 month ago

While I fully agree with the SSD side, you seem to ignore that HDDs are also getting cheaper per TB (always have, and usually quite noticeably). Also the reliability of large to huge SSDs remains to be seen as well. Obviously a breakthrough in HDD technology would have an influence as well, as you mentioned.

I'm not saying SSDs aren't here to take over, they surely will eventually (preferably sooner), but I think it'll be a few more years until we got actual price parity per TB. Even when ignoring other aspects like reliability.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You can’t really reliably use consumer SSDs in a server/NAS situation though, unless you more prepared to replace them every 12-24 months and suffer poor read/write speeds under load

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 1 points 1 month ago

SSDs last longer than hard drives in most situations.

https://youtu.be/D39kk1mMDUU

What do you mean poor speeds under load?

[–] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You would replace your NAS drives with SSDs?

Im not super experienced with NAS and only started home networking like three years ago. but I read SSDs would die quicker than traditional disks.

[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I’m not sure although it’s mostly used for media storage so there aren’t a lot of write operations. Having said that I do have solid state M2 drives in there for caching with no issues so far.