this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2024
215 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13541 readers
813 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://www.thenation.com/article/society/ssi-rules-families-poverty/

The Supplemental Security Income program (SSI) was created in 1972 under the Nixon administration to provide financial support to low-income seniors and disabled people. An effort to federalize state-level adult support programs across the country, SSI is a means-tested program—there are financial requirements to be eligible. In the case of SSI, as of its last adjustment in 1989, enrollees cannot have savings of more than $2,000 as an individual or $3,000 as a family. Furthermore, SSI beneficiaries are prohibited from having retirement accounts, life insurance policies, certain types of personal property, funeral/burial policies, and access to other types of income.

[emphasis mine]

OMG I'm gonna test some means! hillgasm

amerikkka

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Hexboare@hexbear.net 38 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The threat of a long sentence at the end of a trial if you lose is one aspect, but the really insidious part is that you'll probably spend longer locked up (in pre-trial detention) regardless of whether you are found innocent, compared to just taking the plea bargain.

[–] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 33 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Right to a speedy trial*

*On a geological timescale

[–] Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 month ago

You pretty much always have to waive that right in order to do anything more than accept the first plea bargain in a case. Even negotiating for a better plea they make you waive it, because everything takes so long. Took me like almost a year of pre-trial supervision before we finally reached a plea I felt I could take. I did fuck up though, so I definitely wasn’t going to take it to trial if I could avoid it. I can’t imagine how horrid the process is for those innocent or being charged with ridiculous charges. It was bad enough living in that hell knowing that I’d fucked up and deserved some sort of justice applied against me. Thankfully I pulled my head out of my ass, sobered up, and funny enough, once I wasn’t drunk all the time, my left leanings came flooding back in a wave of memories as I could think again and I went even further left than I was before I got pulled into hedonism.

[–] Hexboare@hexbear.net 16 points 1 month ago

You have the right to a speedy trial, and you'll only get the evidence through discovery the day before the trial commences.

[–] Frank@hexbear.net 26 points 1 month ago

Yeah. There've been so many maddening, terrifying stories of people, kids, being held in pre-trial detention of years, or even dying, because us-foreign-policy "they're a flight risk".

[–] Des@hexbear.net 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

and often people in county lockup are postively wistful for DOC prison time. 23/7 lockdown, often maximum security facilities and because of overcrowding, 3 or 4 to a cell

obviously don't get me started on jails in the desert states of the U.S.

it's designed to break you even though you are technically "innocent until proven guilty"

[–] Hexboare@hexbear.net 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In Norway they have a queueing system (ukkk) where you can be sentenced to prison but put on a waitlist until a slot opens up.

It can really fuck with people because they don't know when the government is going to pick them up and chuck them in prison (only that it will happen in the next couple of years)

[–] Frank@hexbear.net 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

What's even the point? If they're not enough of a threat to society to be immediately isolated then this is just pure sadism.

[–] Hexboare@hexbear.net 2 points 1 month ago

Perfectly efficient technocratic sadism