this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2024
132 points (97.1% liked)

memes

22792 readers
250 users here now

dank memes

Rules:

  1. All posts must be memes and follow a general meme setup.

  2. No unedited webcomics.

  3. Someone saying something funny or cringe on twitter/tumblr/reddit/etc. is not a meme. Post that stuff in /c/slop

  4. Va*sh posting is haram and will be removed.

  5. Follow the code of conduct.

  6. Tag OC at the end of your title and we'll probably pin it for a while if we see it.

  7. Recent reposts might be removed.

  8. Tagging OC with the hexbear watermark is praxis.

  9. No anti-natalism memes. See: Eco-fascism Primer

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Glasgow@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago (11 children)

Yes all economists are stupid and only the hexbears understand economics.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 35 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Imagine your house is on fire.

The fire department tells you that the fire has stopped spreading and is now contained.

An economist would tell you that this means the house is safe and you can go back inside.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 33 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's pretty safe to say that people who are continuously wrong about everything and fail to predict economic crashes that happen like clockwork might indeed be kind of stupid.

[–] Flyberius@hexbear.net 30 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Well, we don't deny the reality in front of our eyes. I'm sure for rich economists that get published in the news and in journals, things look dandy to them.

[–] Tom742@hexbear.net 28 points 1 month ago

Yes all economists are stupid and only the hexbears understand economics.

New site tagline

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 27 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

good to have confirmed tbh

[–] vovchik_ilich@hexbear.net 26 points 1 month ago

It's not so much "all economists are stupid", but it is definitely "for the past half a century neoliberalism has been pushed as the only socially and academically acceptable form of understanding economics, it's been the only framework of economics that gets taught in universities in the western world, and neoliberalism is a dogma cult whose most basic axioms are wrong, which is why it consistently fails to predict economic trends and in particular crises and to produce policy to adequately tackle them. People who go outside neoliberalism, such as Post-Keynesians or Marxian economists, aren't taken seriously in academia or in media, aren't given research or teaching positions, and the cycle perpetuates."

For examples of this, see empirical evidence of how rising minimum wage doesn't produce inflation or reduce employment, how price limits don't necessarily lead to shortages, how creation of money doesn't generally create inflation, how government debt is a useless parameter to measure the well-being of an economy, or how the biggest countries in the EU have stagnated for 15+ years of austerity policy without recovering the GDP per capita of 2008 while China consistently breaks growth expectations despite its economy being predicted every two years to crash the following year.

[–] kristina@hexbear.net 22 points 1 month ago
[–] miz@hexbear.net 22 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Richard Wolff made a great point when he said that capitalism has two college departments dedicated to teaching about it: One is called economics, whose purpose is to train people on how to cheerlead the system using purely hypothetical concepts. The other is called business school, and it exists because economics departments don't actually teach somebody how to administrate capitalist enterprise, so they have to educate different people on how to actually make the system function.

[–] bananon@hexbear.net 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

A fair distinction, but on the other hand, I’m friends with someone with a marketing degree, and they were doing puzzles and coloring in their senior level classes.

[–] Beetle_O_Rourke@hexbear.net 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] bananon@hexbear.net 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

No, their first team building exercise was splitting into groups and completing a puzzle together. His group did not finish.

[–] PoY@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 month ago

the lines were drawn together too closely

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Don't forget the third one, military, used when people reject first two.

[–] TechnoUnionTypeBeat@hexbear.net 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The immortal science of Marxism wins again soviet-chad

“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.”
― Upton Sinclair

[–] PoY@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 month ago