this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2024
193 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13538 readers
797 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ZWQbpkzl@hexbear.net 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I was under the impression that the b-2 had a smallish payload due to it stealth constraints but maybe that was just in comparison to the B-52.

Jesus this is grim they're resorting to tactics they haven't used since Vietnam.

[–] FunkYankkkees@hexbear.net 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

b2 can carry 40,000lb payload, b-52 is 70,000lb

[–] Findom_DeLuise@hexbear.net 6 points 1 month ago

And everyone forgets about the B-1, which can carry even more 500 pound bombs than the B-52.

[–] TechnoUnionTypeBeat@hexbear.net 3 points 1 month ago

Jesus this is grim they're resorting to tactics they haven't used since Vietnam.

I can't say for sure how they're using it - a bomber that big can carry fewer, larger weapons, after all - but it's more to say that the B-2 isn't a small tactical bomber, like an Su-34 or something. It can absolutely be used to level an entire neighbourhood in a single pass, if the US willed it