this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
449 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19144 readers
2397 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The headline is a little misleading, she said "at least $15" not that she wants it necessarily at exactly $15/hr and no more

[–] anticolonialist@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Either way it's still another bullshit lie to lead people to the polls. The day after the election it will never be brought up again

[–] BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

At least it's a bullshit lie that appeals to the left, I've been getting tired of the Democrats' campaign strategy of "we need to move further right."

[–] anticolonialist@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They are saying shit like this because they see they are bleeding the left leaning vote. They will still keep going to the right.

[–] BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"The left doesn't like our party."

"Let's go more conservative to appeal to voters who are probably ok with voting for the more fascistic candidate."

"We're losing support among leftists, better double down on being conservative."

The Democrats lose the election.

"Why would the Left do this?"

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

"Clearly we didn't move far enough to the right. The left are unreliable voters who don't appreciate everything we do for the right."

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Except Democrats did try to pass $15 after the last election. It didn't work and a bunch of the worst ones defected, but it wasn't just quietly forgotten.

[–] anticolonialist@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They let the unelected parliamentarian say they couldn't do it. The person that has zero power in congress

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Then they had a vote and failed to pass it. But they didn't just quietly ignore the campaign.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sanders led the group that called for the vote. As centrists are so delighted to point out when it's convenient to them, Sanders is not a Democrat.

If it were up to Democrats, they would have thrown up their hands and gleefully announced that there was nothing they could do. Sanders is the reason you can pretend that Democrats don't hate workers.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Oh please. This started as a simple false statement and now you're moving the goalposts for them. The Democrats didn't just propose $15 and "the day after the election it [was] never brought up again". They tried, maybe they could have tried more, but that they weren't even close to 50 suggests any path was a failure. They did have 40-something Democrats though, aka the vast majority of the party. That there are shitty Democrats isn't a revelation.

And this idea that Sanders isn't a Democrat in any meaningful way is fun trivia, not something a person who is attempting to engage in meaningful conversation about politics takes seriously. He caucuses with them, wins the Democratic primary in his state, competes to lead the party, and supports Democratic nominees even when they're from the other end of the party. The centrists are disingenuous idiots but so are the leftists who do the exact same thing. Sanders likes the aesthetic of "independent", good for him, he's still on team (D) and not remotely the only good senator on it.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago

Oh please. This started as a simple false statement and now you’re moving the goalposts for them. The Democrats didn’t just propose $15 and “the day after the election it [was] never brought up again”.

Changing the tense changes it from the prediction it was to something you can take issue with by pretending OP was talking about past events.

They tried, maybe they could have tried more, but that they weren’t even close to 50 suggests any path was a failure.

Yup. So Democrats are fucking useless at raising wages, and promises from them regarding raising wages should be treated as the lies they are.

They did have 40-something Democrats though, aka the vast majority of the party. That there are shitty Democrats isn’t a revelation.

It certainly isn't. But gripe about them and you're literally trump/putin.

And this idea that Sanders isn’t a Democrat in any meaningful way is fun trivia, not something a person who is attempting to engage in meaningful conversation about politics takes seriously.

It was in 2016 and 2020 when centrists defended the party's treatment of the progressive wing with "Sanders isn't even a Democrat!" When it's convenient for centrists, he's not a Democrat. When centrists want to steal credit for his work that centrists worked with their Republican buddies to block, suddenly he's a Democrat.