We need to save our planet first before we can think about moving anywhere else.
We have no sustainable human civilizations in Antarctica or under water, we should prioritize building in/on the most inhospitable parts before we think about other planets.
I honestly don't care about billionaires' pet projects and I don't find any inspiration in their space walks and vanity visits. We know this is all meant for the most wealthy and will not be accessible to the masses (besides the purpose of slave labor). You won't catch me giving a solitary fuck about space when it comes from a scientist's mouth, let alone a politician.
We have wars and genocides, we have starvation and pandemics of preventable illnesses. We have so much more pressing issues than space travel.

I stand with what I posted, I really dgaf about space in any way shape or form. It's just bazinga brain shit from A to Z unless you're an actual astrophysicist doing research.

Edit: I have an amendment for number 2, what I mean is: if we can't even build on Antarctica or underwater, why should anyone believe we are going to build settlements on another planet?

"I can't lift 45 kg at the gym, but I'm going to try to lift the 90 kg weights anyway."

[–] gay_king_prince_charles@hexbear.net 10 points 1 day ago

I don't think you understand the point of space exploration.

The goal isn't "moving anywhere else". There has never been a serious proposal to move a large number of people to a different planet for a long period of time. The point of space travel isn't evacuation, it is improving life on earth. Space travel involves a series of extraordinarily difficult challenges that result in useful spinoff technologies. It is true that things like docking two ships in space doesn't improve anyone's life, but that requires quickly pulsing lasers that were later used for LASIK. Spacewalks might not be inspiring, but the insulation used in spacesuits has been used to develop space blankets which are undeniably useful. I don't think we will save the planet without space exploration because it has lead to things like solar panels, GPS, weather detection, improved ability to quantify climate change, improved water production, and other things. Space exploration is a positive venture, not because it allows humans to leave earth, but because it makes our lives better.

Space exploration isn't that expensive either. The most well funded space program in the world costs 20bil/yr, and the most it ever cost was 50bil/yr. For reference, this is a rounding error compared to defense. I agree that we have much more pressing issues, but those are a result of capitalism, not poor resource allocation. Currently and historically, socialist societies have understood the value of research and spinoff technologies and have invested into socialist technologies.

I agree that billionaire space programs accomplish next to nothing, though.