this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
39 points (83.1% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2503 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 15 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I don't get it though. "My wages are shit, so I'll vote for the hyper capitalist oligarchs who will make sure my wages stay shit".

Punching oneself in the face is not the cure for a bloody nose.

[–] PortoPeople@lemm.ee 13 points 1 week ago

Americans have no concept of class or class struggle.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I think the idea is "he promises change, when she says there's nothing to change". He's lying of course, but they hear him talking about an issue (without offering any reasonable solution) and threw their support behind him.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

They didn't throw their support behind him. He got the same number of votes as he got the last two times. The difference is Democrats didn't turn out.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

When I saw him talking, he only seemed to be telling boring stories about himself or doing his usual rants about his personal vendettas against others.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Trump didn't gain voters, Democrats lost voters. The people didnt see Kamalas message and switch to Trump, they saw her message and stayed home.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If their wages are shit, do they want more of the same or any change at all? Seems pretty obvious to me why they voted that way, especially given they don’t understand economics.

[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I feel like Harris didn't even need to explicitly say she would fix the economy or change everything as much as she just needed to come out and say shes aware the economy is not working for everyone. When voters who feel economically dejecected see someone say nothing is wrong, they get the feeling no one is going to help them. A little acknowledgement would have been great.

[–] radiohead37@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

She did say that at almost every rally. The problem is getting the message out.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Yep. Instead we got them crowing about how great they've done and how the stats show things are getting better.

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

That's what happens without class consciousness.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

The problem, basically, is that people don't really have any clear sense of how political decisions actually affect things like wages and cost of living, but they have a very strong sense that political decisions must be having some effect on those things.

So when presented with the choice between "The situation we have" (which definitely sucks), and "something else" (which might suck) they opt for "something else".