this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
749 points (99.3% liked)

People Twitter

5392 readers
336 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AbsoluteChicagoDog@lemm.ee 21 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

The military is literally a socialist meritocracy and for some reason people insist we can't have socialism in the US

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Socialism is the workers owning the means of production.

Professional national armies are the government doing things, how collectivist that is depends on the government.

Even the Soviet Red Army while it was fighting Nazis wasn't "socialist" except in the sense that it was, in theory, defending the rights of the workers.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I wouldn’t really call it socialist because it’s not self-funding. The 99% of non-military people put a huuuuuuuge amount of money into the military community to fund its creation and existence.

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 8 points 3 weeks ago

I wouldn't necessarily call it a meritocracy either because it's way easier to buy your way into being an officer than any E-to-O program and because who gets promoted in a difficult rate can get very political very quickly.

So it's neither of those things.