this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2024
82 points (100.0% liked)

menby

8010 readers
1 users here now

A space for masculine folks to talk about living under patriarchy.

Detoxing masculinity since 1990!

You don’t get points for feminism, feminism is expected.

Guidelines:

  1. Questions over blame
  2. Humility over pride
  3. Wisdom over dogma
  4. Actions over image

Rules (expansions on the guidelines):

  1. Mistakes should be learning experiences when possible.
    • Do not attack comrades displaying vulnerability for what they acknowledge are mistakes.
    • If you see good-faith behavior that's toxic, do your best to explain why it's toxic.
    • If you don't have the energy to engage, report and move on.
    • This includes past mistakes. If you've overcome extreme reactionary behavior, we'd love to know how.
    • A widened range of acceptable discussion means a greater need for sensitivity and patience for your comrades.
    • Examples:
      • "This is reactionary. Here's why."
      • "I know that {reality}, but I feel like {toxicity}"
      • "I don't understand why this is reactionary, but it feels like it {spoilered details}"
  2. You are not entitled to the emotional labor of others.
    • Constantly info-dumping and letting us sort through your psyche is not healthy for any of us.
    • If you feel a criticism of you is unfair, do not lash out.
    • If you can't engage self-critically, delete your post.
    • If you don't know how to phrase why it's unfair, say so.
  3. No singular masculine ideal.
    • This includes promoting gender-neutral traits like "courage" or "integrity" as "manly".
    • Suggestions for an individual to replace a toxic ideal is fine.
    • Don't reinforce the idea the fulfillment requires masculinity.
    • This also includes tendency struggle-sessions.
  4. No lifestyle content.
    • Post the picture of your new grill in !food (feminine people like grills too smh my head).
    • Post the picture of the fish you caught in !sports (feminine people like fish too smdh my damn head).
    • At best, stuff like this is off-topic. At worst, it's reinforcing genders norms..
    • If you're not trying to be seen as masculine for your lifestyle content, it's irrelevant to this comm. If you are trying to be seen as masculine, let's have a discussion about why these things are seen as masculine.

Resources:

*The Will to Change: Men, Masculinity, and Love by Bell Hooks

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

CW: chapter 2 contains a detailed description of child abuse by a parent

Hello comrades, it's time for our second discussion thread for The Will to Change, covering Chapters 2 (Understanding Patriarchy) and 3 (Being a Boy). Thanks to everyone who participated last week, I’m looking forward to hearing everyone’s thoughts again. And if you’re just joining the book club this week, welcome!

In Ch.2 hooks defines patriarchy, how it is enforced by parental figures and society at large, and the struggle of antipatriarchal parents to raise children outside of these rigid norms when the border culture is so immersed in them. Ch.3 delves deeper into the effects of patriarchy on young boys and girls and the systemic apparatuses that reinforce gender norms.

If you haven't read the book yet but would like to, its available free on the Internet Archive in text form, as well as an audiobook on Youtube with content warnings at the start of each chapter, courtesy of the Anarchist Audio Library, and as an audiobook on our very own TankieTube! (note: the YT version is missing the Preface but the Tankietube version has it)

As always let me know if you'd like to be added to the ping list!

Our next discussion will be on Chapters 4 (Stopping Male Violence) and 5 (Male Sexual Being), beginning on 12/11.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PM_ME_YOUR_FOUCAULTS@hexbear.net 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Some thoughts:

  1. The last time I read this I was not a parent, and this definitely hits different now. Both in thinking about myself as a parent and the son I'm raising. It hasn't been an easy time with my son the past couple of years. He's had a lot of difficult behaviors and it's been a long (and ongoing) road to getting him diagnosed and helped. I haven't always handled it the best. I've lost my temper. When he thinks of me, I don't want him to think about me the way fathers are talked about in these chapters. The stuff about patriarchy leaking in everywhere even when you're trying to raise a kid in a nonpatriarchal way is also so true.

  2. "Both the feminist and antifeminist views are rooted in a peculiarly modern American perception that to be a man means to be at the controls and at all times to feel yourself in control."

Banger quote. The conservatives that claim they need to be strapped up to pick up groceries in their enormous lifted pickups come to mind. The demand for control at all times, also breeds constant fear and paranoia. Except...

  1. Curious what other people think, but I felt like hooks goes way too hard on "antimale" feminists, and is too much at pains to depict them as a mirror inverse of male chauvenists (see above). Particularly because male chauvenism kills people daily and is officially and unofficially enshrined everywhere. I don't really agree with that line of thinking, but it emerged from a certain context and was a response to specific material conditions.

  2. I genuinely don't what non patriarchal masculinity is. This probably has a lot to do with me being nonbinary

[–] MiraculousMM@hexbear.net 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I genuinely don't what non patriarchal masculinity is.

Me neither, I've been itching for her to offer an alternative solution but so far that hasn't happened. I assume that will come later in the book after she first describes the core problem, but I would be more satisfied with the read if she at least hinted at where she's going.

[–] AcidSmiley@hexbear.net 7 points 1 month ago

It's something i'm curious about as well. Like i said in our discussion last week, my solution to deal with my toxic masculinity would never work for men, because the transfem approach of "i want to live as a woman, never want to be seen as a man again and therefore can ditch any baggage people put up with to prove their manhood" is obviously not on the table for them. But i do know a lot of dudes who are at least headed in a good direction when it comes to de-patriarchizing masculinity, be they trans men who've been thrown into navigating masculinity as adults or cishet guys who've at some point understood that toxic masculinity blocks them from living a fulfilled, happy life and having the kind of romantic relationships and friendships they need.

And one thing all of them have in common is that they have nothing to prove. Patriarchal masculinity is always on display, there is always the need to broadcast your manlyness, to put on a show of domineering strength and a callous indifference towards hurting yourself and others. The self-described alpha male is a deeply insecure specimen and all the men i feel safe to be around aren't. They don't care if somebody sees them as wife guys or as soft soyboys, because they know on a very deep level that overperforming manhood and being ashamed of deviating from the script are BS. The term "fragile masculinity" exists for a reason. But ridding yourself of that is a tough one to pull off in practice, because there's a built-in paradox.

Unlike gender identity (in this case: being a man), which is internal and independent of the outside world, gender performance (in this case: acting in a masculine role) is always relational, always exists in a social and societal context. And in a patriarchal society, that means that there are always other men who police masculinity and shame you when you do not meet their standards. which is a core concept of chapter 3. To be a non-patriarchal man is a test of patience and resolve in this environment, and being stoic and calm under stress easily ties back into the patriarchal man's core problem to shut himself off emotionally.

If you want to find a way around that, if you do not want to end up in some still toxifying sigma role model, you need spaces to safely vent, show vulnerability and build meaningful connections with others. That's the only way to avoid the usual male trap of bottling up your anguish and letting it fester, in this case the anguish that results from being on the defense against patriarchal men all the time.

It also means that you will have to challenge the posturing and threat displays of patriarchal men. It just comes with the territory that you need to call these guys out when they tell you that ... kissing your gf makes you gay or w/e. To be a non-patriarchal man means joining in the fight against patriarchy, just opting out of the system doesn't work.

[–] dumples@midwest.social 6 points 1 month ago

The final conclusion I think will be something related to have multiple definitions of manhood. Loving Men for who they are and not what they do and how they present. This is similar to how women love women. You can be anything or do anything and still be a woman since you are a woman. This same concept needs to be applied to men.

[–] dumples@midwest.social 6 points 1 month ago

Curious what other people think, but I felt like hooks goes way too hard on “antimale” feminists, and is too much at pains to depict them as a mirror inverse of male chauvenists (see above). Particularly because male chauvenism kills people daily and is officially and unofficially enshrined everywhere. I don’t really agree with that line of thinking, but it emerged from a certain context and was a response to specific material conditions.

I think she goes so hard since it is so damaging to the public perspective to feminism and feminists. Whenever you bring up feminism this is exactly what people think they mean. The number of people who think that feminist hate all men or insist they are anti-feminist because they believe in the equality between the genders.

Male chauvenism is still worst but that isn't as controversial