this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2024
45 points (95.9% liked)
chat
8257 readers
239 users here now
Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.
As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.
Thank you and happy chatting!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I am often annoyed that lots of people say, wholeheartedly accept representation of diverse individuals, without considering that writers might not be creating them for the good will of it, but are only in it for the money. Said writers might make characters halfheartedly, or not care about the character at all.
Could you give some examples of what you feel are half-hearted diverse characters, or those created by writers just for the money?
Well, Disney often makes characters that often come off as token characters, only to then censor said characters for the sake of international markets. Such as Lefou in the Live Action Remake of Beauty And The Beast. His sign of being officially homosexual was in a very easy to miss moment. I have also heard that, they did a similar thing for the lesbian couple in Lightyear, showing it in another form of blink and you miss it scene, and removing it for some international markets. Not to mention that companies would likely no longer make characters like that if they aren't profitable.
Writers who make it to the professional level aren't doing their job for goodwill, the whole thing is for money. No big corporation producing commercial art gives a single shit about representation for moral reasons, they are making a product, and ensuring that it appeals to its target demographic and is broadly inoffensive to people they believe are likely to buy it.
We haven't yet managed to do away with this, and a soulless profit machine that includes diverse characters is better than one that doesn't.