this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2025
84 points (97.7% liked)
Slop.
325 readers
544 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip
founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
@flicker@lemmy.dbzer0.com Why are you like this?
Neurodivergence, a boatload of childhood trauma, and like a smidge of drugs (to manage the first two)!
I suggest taking a look at the thread here.
I looked at it. I agree with yall that liberals are the greater threat, but I'm one of those people who prefers to say that all the things I disagree with are things I disagree with.
I'm an idealist. I don't agree to authoritarianism of any type. As far as authoritarianism goes, I'd prefer communist, but overall, I'd rather we didn't at all.
Idealist is not an actual ideology, it's a term describing the vibes-based shadow-puppet analysis liberalism teaches us to engage in
It's not a problem that you think that way, but when it's time to go outside, touch grass, and unionize a workplace/volunteer to help marginalized people/do community outreach/other praxis, do you consider other people in the organization having an "authoritarian" ideology a dealbreaker?
I've been known to unite against a common enemy with most kinds. That doesn't mean I agree with them or like them or empower them.
But most direct action I'm involved in is with the tribe I've found IRL, who think like I do, or it's done anonymously. So there's not a lot of room for quizzing about some kind of needless hierarchy of beliefs. If someone shows up at a protest supporting an issue, and they're supporting that issue, I'm not going to stop and quiz them about their other beliefs.
We're online. I'm allowed to be vocal in my dislike of any specificity. It's usually needless to rank those dislikes.
imagine being a radlib and using this nomenclature to refer to your org
Imagine assuming everyone needs an organization to do anything.
That kind of needless hierarchy is exactly what I'm talking about.
my primary org is anarchosyndical but by all means keep appropriating 'tribe' because you think it's a necessarily flat structure and have no idea how racist and colonial you sound.
you radlibs give anarchism a bad name.
You're making a lot of assumptions. You really want to be offended by me. You know nothing of the people I associate with, who they are, what they stand for.
I'm not going to dox myself in an attempt to correct you. And the constant insults have grown old.
We're quite finished.
Hannah Arendt trick y'all