this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2025
384 points (98.7% liked)

Canada

8859 readers
1628 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fabian@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I would support stronger ties to Canada, but Canada is not exactly in Europe

[–] TheDorkfromYork@lemm.ee 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Canada does share a land boarder with Denmark.

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 day ago

Two! Both sea and land borders with France. Don't forget Vimy Ridge!

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We do where. Seems Denmark is really far away.

[–] ADTJ@feddit.uk 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think they're referring to Greenland but I'm not aware of a land border

[–] Warehouse@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago

Greenland is part of Denmark, we share a border with them through Hans Island

[–] vapourisation@programming.dev 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What if we just take Canada and move it over a little?

[–] Fabian@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Thinking outside the ~~box~~ continent. I like it

[–] Muffi@programming.dev 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Why would that matter? It's a political and economical union, not a geographical one.

[–] Fabian@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

As the parliament says

In order to apply for EU membership, a country has to be European and respect the EU's democratic values

https://www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/en/article/20180126STO94113/enlargement-how-do-countries-join-the-eu

Since according to Article 49

The applicant country must [...] be a European state;

https://publications.europa.eu/resource/cellar/0ae670d2-1ece-4994-b1e3-adda39e1c6de.0006.03/DOC_1

[–] Pixelnator@pawb.social 1 points 17 hours ago

As mentioned in the post above, what constitutes as European is decided by the European Council and European Commission. You are correct in that it is a requirement but there is nothing stopping them from going "Canada is European, as it shares our values, ideals, and ideologies". The decision does not have to be geographical.

It's unlikely and kind of a "the rules don't say a dog can't play basketball" type move but it's technically valid.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Cyprus isn't in Europe at all and is in the EU. You just have to be "substantially" European, according to whatever committee.

Failing that, it's possible to be in the EU in every way but officially. Norway and Switzerland have that situation.

[–] SheenSquelcher@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

respect the EU's democratic values

Just like Hungary does?

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

They did when they got in.

The problem is that it's impossible to kick out a member if they stop respecting the EU's democratic values whilst being a member.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's literally one of their requirements.

[–] Pixelnator@pawb.social 3 points 17 hours ago

The definition of what classifies as European is up to the assessment of the European Council and the European Commission and need not be defined by geography.

III. CONDITIONS OF ACCESSION a) The European State

The sole material condition laid down by Article O of the TEU is that the applicant must be a 'European State'. There is no unequivocal interpretation of that criterion. It can be read equally well in geographical, cultural or political terms.

In 1987 an application to become a Member of the Communities was received from Morocco. The application was rejected by the Council on the grounds that Morocco was not a European State ( 7). In the case of Turkey, Article 28 of the Association Agreement signed in 1963 incudes the option of Turkey's eventually acceding to the Communities. Turkey in fact lodged an application to accede on 14 April 1987. Historically, Turkey has formed part of the so-called 'European concert'. Although part of Turkey's territory is located geographically in Asia, Parliament, the Council and the Commission have confirmed Turkey's eligibility ( 8). This example shows that the term 'European State' need not be interpreted in a strictly geographical sense. It is at all events a criterion subject to political assessment.

https://www.europarl.europa.eu/enlargement/briefings/23a2_en.htm

In other words if we decide that Canada counts, then Canada counts.

[–] SheenSquelcher@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

Maybe not right now but requirements can be changed, especially in times of need.

[–] Allero 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

So are many parts of the Netherlands or France, for example

Local residents are not Europeans, they don't necessarily even use euro despite their mainland countries doing just that, but they are residents of the European Union.

[–] Fabian@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

True, but 'being in the EU' is actually not that simple, and these territories have special statuses and and are not part of the 'core EU'. Here is a simple visualization