this post was submitted on 04 May 2025
96 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13815 readers
894 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] sempersigh@hexbear.net 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Z_Poster365@hexbear.net 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

read it, it's very funny

In a brief order issued on Monday, Judge Kent noted that “each page of plaintiff’s complaint appears on an e-filing which is dominated by a large multicolored cartoon dragon dressed in a suit, presumably because she is represented by the law firm of ‘Dragon Lawyers PC © Award Winning Lawyers.’

“Use of this dragon cartoon logo is not only distracting, it is juvenile and impertinent,” Judge Kent wrote. “The Court is not a cartoon.” But Mr. Perrone, 43, also defended his use of the mythical beast as a way to market his firm. He said that he had he bought the image of the dragon in a suit for about $20 online.

“People like dragons,” he said...

Mr. Perrone, who has practiced law for 17 years, said he would not stop using the dragon, but would be more judicious about displaying it on legal filings.

[–] miz@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago

“People like dragons,” he said...

michael-laugh okay this guy is awesome