this post was submitted on 11 May 2025
209 points (94.5% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2849 readers
971 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tinidril@midwest.social -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

viable third party candidates

There is no such thing.

If we want to win a Democratic primary then we will have to overcome the Democratic establishment. If we want to skip the primary and win the general, then we will have to overcome both parties. It's much easier to completely shut out third party candidates in the general than to freeze a popular candidate out of a primary.

The biggest barrier any progressive candidate has to overcome is that there is a massive core of disengaged Democratic voters who just want to beat the Republican, and they have totally swallowed the myth of centrists doing better because they appeal to the right.

Having to overcome that at the same time we have to overcome the very real narrative that a third party candidate will just split the Democratic vote is absolutely impossible.

The only two things that might save Republicans in 2028 are Democrats winning big in 2026 and doing nothing, and the bulk of the progressive movement backing a third party.

[–] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 1 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I don't think it is easier. The DNC controls the processes and all the systems within their own party plus the media biases, while a third party who makes it to the general only has to contend with the normal difficulties of the media. They've done different kinds of maneuvering each of the last 3 primaries to prove this, not to mention other things like tipping the scales in local primaries or choosing that old guy over AOC for that committee seat they were fighting for.

A lot of anti-establishment voters went from Bernie to Trump, so I think the right candidate can maneuver this middle path, not by being a centrist but by appealing to people who hate the establishment in this country but want someone other than Trump after he no doubt fucks up again.

[–] ExtantHuman@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago

A third party has never gotten more than a couple percent of the vote. They often didn't even qualify for the ballot in every state. They are not viable with first past the post

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

while a third party who makes it to the general only has to contend with the normal difficulties of the media.

When you look at how Democrats control primaries, it's almost entirely through their cozy relationship with the media. It was more direct in 2016, but in 2020 it was a consistent message from the media that Bernie was less electable and Trump had to be defeated.

If you were familiar with running as a third party in even local elections, you would know that just getting on the ballot as a third party is a massive effort. Also, the controls that Democrats have over the primary process, Democrats and Republicans together have over the general election process.

choosing that old guy over AOC for that committee seat

That has nothing to do with popular elections, but it does bring up a good point. Do you think AOC would have been more likely to get that seat if she were in a third party? Once you start getting people into office, you will still be dependent on coalitions with Democrats to get anything done.

A lot of anti-establishment voters went from Bernie to Trump, so I think the right candidate can maneuver this middle path

Here is the thing that drives me nuts. You are not proposing anything that hasn't been tried over and over again. Third party advocates point to the limited gains of progressives within the Democratic party, and ignore their own elong history of total failure. What you "think" defies pretty obvious reality.

[–] WanderingVentra@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago

To be clear, we'd need a large movement in this country to abandon the Democratic party before I think it would work, but I think it's worth pushing for because the Dems seem like a lost cause, unless all of the leadership and entrenched establishment within there is changed at the same time. It's the same reason you can't change a corrupt police department by joining as a good cop. It just doesn't work that way. Besides, it's happened before in this country with a popular enough leader (it's why we don't have Whigs anymore, or a Bull Moose party).