politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
As opposed to the sycophants that hid biden's mental decline?
Biden hasn't been president for over a hundred days now perhaps you should get a life
You saw the party hide the mental decline of the guy with his finger on the nuclear button.
That's unacceptable under trump and unacceptable under biden. We can't make that mistake again. Avoiding talking about it guarantees it will happen again.
It was also unacceptable under Reagan. At this point I think we can call it a tradition.
Personally, I'd like democrats to be better than that.
If liberals can still bi**tch about Nader and Gore 25 years later I can be a little salty over a president that's been gone 100 days. They lied about the mental capacity of someone that could start a nuclear war, they lied about wanting to protect the lives of Palestinians, and that's just the lies they've been caught in
Oh my God! Biden might fall asleep and rest his head on the big red button and start World War III! Thank God we now have a very stable genius who will start a nuclear war just because he thinks it will make him look tough.
Claiming it was only about him falling asleep is disingenuous. He was senile as fuck and so is the current pedo in office.
it must be really hard living in a delusional State all the time
The only thing delusional is liberals thinking they are a progressive left wing party and not enablers of fascism.
That you think the two are remotely similar, shows how disingenuous you are. That you imply that this was unusual or even noteworthy at this point. Implies your ignorance of even relatively recent history. You do realize you've breached your instances echo chambers.
I never actually advocated for either candidate. But we told you it was going to be a Democrat or Republican regardless of what we wanted. But people like yourself actively ignored what was actually on the ballot. Instead campaigning to assist the fascist. Which is unsurprising. Someone from a pro authoritarian instance feeling more comfortable getting a fellow authoritarian elected.
We all want better. But we'll never achieve it. Because so many of you fail to understand the basic assignment or options available. Doing more harm than good in all the uninformed flailing.
Liberals will never get anywhere until they realize their own party is complicit in that fascism. It didn't happen in a vacuum. Fascism always is enabled by a weak, or perceived weak, liberal party.
Liberals always claim they want better but they proceed to vote for the things that are preventing things from getting better. They're the greatest enemies to progress, they talk as if they want change, but they demand things stay the same
I agree and tankies like you are just as bad
Tankie is to liberal what woke is to maga
centrists really don't like it when you point out that they shriek "tankie" at the left while kissing republican ass.
some are definitely sycophants; but i think most are useful idiots and i think you're seeing here how effectively they're being redirected by shills and other idiots to the re-frame the discourse away from biden and onto trump; i hope you continue to persist despite their downvotes and their attempts to goad you into getting banned or making you turn away from your efforts.
Lol
"Don't worry about Trump guys, he's doing great! Keep up the good fight against Joe Biden, he's the real enemy! I'm totally a real person that 100% came up with this original thought that I 100% believe in on my own."
Covert bot reference?
Sounds like a rule violation
Sarcasm isn't rule breaking.
Doesn't look like sarcasm
It's retroactive sarcasm.
I've fought ignorance for decades, this is no different