Yeah his article about why married women should be more grateful about getting to do more housework is so dishonest. He's criticizing a different substack article, insisting that his carefully selected quote isn't leaving anything important out. He immediately just straight up lies about what's in the rest of the article. Soon after, he cites one study, using two charts from it and conveniently neglecting to mention that the rest of the study he's leaving out refutes his argument.

Can't trust a conservative, folks! classic

[–] sleeplessone@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Yikes! I checked out the comment section and found it a bit fishy that some commenters were lamenting young peoples' lack of familiarity with the bible ("the most influential piece of literature in the modern Western canon" as one put it). Also, looking through some of his articles now, I'm seeing a lot of chud shit including this cognito hazard of a subtitle.

CW: Anti-GSM discrimination, ableism

Just because it can't make you gay or autistic or give you ADHD doesn't make it pointless

[–] BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net 7 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Wow, that opening paragraph is setting off the "do not let this couple corner you at a party" klaxon.

My wife inhabits a corner of the internet almost entirely disjoint from my own, the woman part. I get youtube recommendations for wood working and speed runs, she sees makeup tips and fashion. Every site or app that’s even a little algorithmic shows this same basic pattern, keyed in part by our demographic data but more by our patterns of attention. This site is no exception, and she regularly sees and forwards essays to me that may as well come from another planet in terms of how far they are away from my algorithmic cluster. Sharing these gendered feeds with each other is a great source of topics for the never-ending conversation we’ve been having since the day we met.