this post was submitted on 22 May 2025
641 points (98.6% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2873 readers
752 users here now

Welcome to !usa@midwest.social, where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] uid0gid0@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 29 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"Ohhhhhh, you actually believed all that freedom crap? Lol. Lmao. We've got about three thousand asterisks and terms and conditions apply on every part of the bill of rights."

They've so thoroughly built in so many shitty little backdoors into the constitution that it's basically just a joke that only rich people are in on at this point.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So they can force you to unlock your phone?

[–] Alenalda@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

If you use fingerprint or facial unlock, yes

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Hmm. There is some brolegal advice (brolegal because I can’t verify it other than people talking about it on the internet) that suggests hard locking your phone may prevent access by LEO. IOW forcing the phone to require a code entry to unlock it by resetting/power off/on the phone so that faceID and fingerprint no longer work.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 2 points 12 hours ago

I've NEVER allowed fingerprint or facial rec on any of my phones. I just got a new one, and I skipped right over that page. You are going to have to be nice enough to me that I will give you my password and pattern.