this post was submitted on 25 May 2025
205 points (95.6% liked)

Games

39021 readers
761 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Categorizing this as engagement rather than just the number of people who finished the game seems incredibly stupid.

[–] MurrayL@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Because hours of play has no direct relationship with completion. Playing for 100+ hours doesn’t mean you’ve finished the game.

[–] thisisbutaname@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

80 hours in and I'm nowhere near, I'm more likely to spin up a new character than to finish the thing

[–] Sprinks@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

~~Almost 200hrs~~ 260 hrs in (i double checked haha), level 150, and im maybe 3/4 done. I was never interested in soul like games before, or video games in general, but something about the open world experience in elden ring just pulled me in. I honestly couldnt tell you most of the story or the boss names, but god damn it was and still is a fucking blast grinding out the fights to figure out the mechanics.

[–] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

But you'll see similar rates of players finishing the game that have far shorter runtimes. 100 hours is about how long it takes to finish the game, after all, and that percentage lines up quite well with the achievements for finishing the game. Engagement is a horrible metric for a game like Elden Ring that isn't trying to keep you hooked with anything except a game you like playing; no battle pass, no dailies, no events, etc. I'll bet A Dance With Dragons has far better engagement metrics than The Return of the King, but it's a stupid metric regardless, because they're books.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

NO direct relationship? maybe it’s not 1:1 but surely there is some kind of direct relationship.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Depends on your definition of "direct."

I've played around 1k hours of Europa Universalis IV and I've never completed a campaign (gotten to the last year in the game), because I find I've completed my goals about halfway or two thirds of the way through the time line. The same goes for most Civ games, I just quit and restart once I know I've won.

I imagine Elden Ring is similar for many people, they play a character for a couple dozen hours and restart with a new character.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

definition of “direct.”

a direct relationship means the variables increase or decrease with each other, but not necessarily in the same proportion.

[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why are you guys arguing? The chart means exactly what it says. People who have played the game with more than 100+ hours. It says nothing about people who’ve finished the game.

There’s probably some sort of positive relationship between the two, but we’d need mire information.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Why are you guys arguing?

why are YOU arguing?

There’s probably some sort of positive relationship between the two, but we’d need mire information.

that's literally all i was saying.

Yeah but if you haven’t finished new game seven with no armor or weapons did you really finish the game?