politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
I cannot — I performatively refuse to — believe that the meaning of « genocide », « fascism » and « nazi » — dogmas that shaped the fundamental beliefs of many generations —would be controversial again.
I think that the term 'Nazi' needs to die.
These people are not members of the National Socialist German Workers' Party, aka Nazis. They are fascists.
Some of the members of this movement cosplay as Nazis, but they are not Nazis. We call these people, who wear Nazi symbols and glorify the Nazis, neoNazis
Using the term 'Nazi' to describe the fascists taking control of the US Government unnecessarily muddies the discussion on top of being factually incorrect. Words have meaning. Twisting the meaning of words in order to suit your political agenda is irresponsible, at best.
Call fascists fascists because that's what they are. Don't use a term that lets them red herring every conversation by turning it into an argument about the term 'Nazi'.
Just do the https://zionism.wtf/ when it's up again qnd yoy eill how similar both ideology is, thr only difference is who they target
They literally funded the Nazis and tried to ally with them. They are surely close enough to warrant the reminder of that fact.
They did not fund the National Socialist German Workers Party, they funded the AFD. And if you scoff and say "Same thing", well that's exactly the problem we're talking about. They aren't the same thing. They're both fascists, but the AFD are not LITERALLY Nazi's. And so by using Nazi to describe them, you are continuing to muddy the waters and give people a reason to dismiss you.
It is easy for them to ignore being called Nazi's, because they are not literally Nazi's. It is harder for them to ignore being called fascists, because they ARE literally fascists.
You're grossly misrepresenting what the Haavara Agreement was.
From the Haavara Agreement wikipedia article:
The Nazis frozen the accounts of German jews and the Haavara Agreement was an agreement that Jews would leave Germany in exchange for their funds being transferred with them. Nazi was still trying to find solutions to the "Jewish question" and this was seen as a way to coerce Jews into leaving.
This was not Zionists funding Nazi Germany or trying to ally with them. It was a Nazi tactic to financially coerce German jews to leave Germany.
You guys are so weird , you never condemn israel is posts about their crime and just when it is compared with nazi you start arguing when israel methods and statements are very similar to each other
Who are 'you guys'?
You're fighting a strawman that you've created in your head that's an amalgamation of every post you disagree with.
You've likely never seen anything that I've written before so you have no basis for anything that you've claimed. Implying that I'm pro-Zionist is very much incorrect.
You guy are the people who got more mad about comparison between israel and nazi then all thr massacres comited every day in gaza
People comment and post history is public for everybody. I know that you don't comment on posts are massacres
Do you really think hitler did the deal with nothing in return?
It's not voluntary if the only other option is to have your family's wealth confiscated and be forced to stay in 1930s Germany which was, as anyone should know, very hostile to Jewish people (including the mass extermination).
You're ignoring the implied threat of impending violence and seizure of property.
It's like claiming that a bank voluntarily gave money to a bank robber.
I literally linked the wikipedia article that contains the quote, what the hell are you talking about?
Because you keep claiming that it was based on coercion or force. It was not. You are using one quote out of context to try and dismiss the entire rest of the entry.
I kinda agree. They are worse than Nazis as they should know better. They soil the memory of their family members that were murdered by Nazis in order to do the same upon others.
The people of Nazi Germany only halfway understood what was happening, and those who did were thrown in jail if they spoke out. They were told the jews were being rounded up into educational camps.
We executed the nazis. Wish we could send the neo nazis to 1930 germany.
Wrong comment
I didn't call them the same thing. It's very different. They built their home on the suffering of their ancestors. They have claimed absolution and mercy over the suffering they had to endure since the diaspora. They are not Nazi's, Nazis killed their grandparents. These are Zionist Jews and that nomer should be as foul as nazi.
So you have misread my comment we are basically in agreement
My mistake, I meant to respond to a different reply.