this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2025
882 points (96.0% liked)

Political Memes

8513 readers
2878 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MediocreBee@lemmy.world 129 points 6 days ago (10 children)
[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 38 points 6 days ago

That's much better.

[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 25 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Needs Colorado on there somewhere too. That place is a blue oasis surrounded by a sea of red bullshit states on all sides.

[–] Captain_Buddha@lemmy.world 29 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They elected Hoedirt Boebert... no entry.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 21 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You say "they" as if states don't have different districts. Boebert came from a right-leaning district, but was so toxic she couldn't get re-elected there. So she had to move to an even more right district in order to win.

[–] neukenindekeuken@sh.itjust.works 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Add to that she's actually a transplant from Florida, and it starts to make sense.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 3 points 4 days ago

Yeah. Her saying "don't you know who I am!?" and flipping off the workers after getting kicked out for refusing to stop vaping indoors and near pregnant women and performing public sexual acts at a musical where kids were in attendance... That's pure Florida.

[–] Sweetpeaches69@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

And New Mexico! Please don't leave us with those shitheads.

[–] cenzorrll@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 days ago

I guess we could go to Mexico and take Colorado with us. The border can cross us again.

[–] cenzorrll@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Not to the south, NM is just as blue if not more so.

[–] halferect@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

If I recall new Mexico is the only state that had a full Democrat victory this last election with not one republican winning a single seat so pretty blue

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

I propose we get CO and they can have WI, MI and PA

[–] MisterFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Considering them petitioning to leave Oregon, I feel like eastern Oregon would be very upset about this

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I'm sure the sane people in those new Canadian provinces would want universal healthcare, but would they be willing to give up their guns? I think most of Canada is appalled at the gun violence in the US and would make giving up guns an unconditional requirement of joining Canada.

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Deaths by firearm, per 100,000 people, are about 1/7 the number in Canada as it is in America.

America has over 200 school shootings a year. 2024 saw a near record with 330 school shootings.

Canada? 6 in its entire history. To get to the grand total of 9, you would have to include post-secondary institutions.

If you truly want to “think about the children”, firearm control comes wwwaaaaaaayyyyy before banning books and taking away lunches.

[–] SippyCup@feddit.nl 9 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Hey take some cities as enclaves too. Blue cities in red states don't deserve that kind of punishment.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 6 days ago (2 children)

What about the liberals in conservative areas? We all gonna hold off because they're gonna get eaten by the dogs, too? What about liberal kids of conservative parents?

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Just like now where they can all move to Massachusetts, under this plan, they can move to Canada

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 days ago

I think the red area should get alberta, maybe saskatchewan too. And I would personally like to see the Alaska pan handle transferred to B.C.

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago

Alaska would join Canada at this point I bet.

[–] SpicyColdFartChamber@lemm.ee 4 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Realistically this wouldn't be possible, at least in the way most people assume. It's hard for people to just uproot their whole lives and move to another state (though it's easier these days), a partition like this would mean leaving behind a lot of liberal minded people, who are too poor or too rooted in a place.

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

So would the genocide be the eggs or the omelets?

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Neither, but I suspect you know your argument is in bad faith.

It's better to protect some people than none, and if that means balkanizing the US then that sucks for the blue islands in the Bible Belt but we are in crisis and that means triage.

[–] drunkpostdisaster@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Sounds like you are in a nice situation.

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

It'd be a lot nicer if Alabama wasn't dragging it down.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

On a family zoom call we were comparing house moves. My bro had the record at like 51 times he moved his house. One year he moved to Manhattan, then to Harlem, then to London.

It's not hard, but it can be complex.

[–] SpicyColdFartChamber@lemm.ee 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

This is not just a simple house move, this is a whole on nation move, where you may never get to go back. There's will be massive paperwork, a lot of uncertainty, chaos and pain. From my anecdotal knowledge on what happened in countries like west/east germany, north/south korea, india/pak, I can say that this event will be very stressful for a lot of people.

Especially if you have to move for your safety. You might have to sell your house for cheaper than what it's worth, you might not be able to buy new land or find good renting opportunities. You might have to sell your business or close down. You might have to find new jobs, new schools, new everything. And some people just don't want to leave their home, no matter how fucked things are, because there's a chance they'll never see it again.

This isn't to mention, the pain that will come with such a divorce, the shame, and the lost hopes.

It's definitely hard and complex. I think you are greatly underestimating how traumatic such a move would be for a lot of people (even if it maybe necessary).

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Moves are a pain, the biggest part is you lose circles of support as in friends, colleagues, community. But moving itself, while sucking badly is not terribly difficult. I have moved from UK, to Ontario, now to BC and its probably 12 houses I have lived in so far. You start to simplify your belongings as you go, but starting fresh friendship connections is the tricky part.

[–] swelter_spark@reddthat.com 1 points 4 days ago

Moving from one state to another in the US costs about $10-20k if you hire a service. If you pack and move everything yourself and rent a truck you can take that down to around $6-7k, but the physical labor involved is strenuous. For people who don't have a lot of money or who are old or not physically strong, I think it's reasonable to describe it as difficult.

[–] SpicyColdFartChamber@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I was talking about the divorce as a whole. It would have some very serious ramifications. Moving wouldn't be easy, because you'd be doing so under a whole different set of circumstances than moving abroad for studying or for a job. It's not just you, it's everyone who wants to live a "liberal democracy" who would want to move and it wouldn't be easy at all, imo.

Historically mass exodus aren't fun.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

We can have ChatGPT generate the paperwork. What could go wrong?

[–] 5in1k@lemm.ee 2 points 5 days ago

I have a garage filled with large power tools, my family and friends are all here and I own the land I live on. It’s hard and expensive to just uproot all that. For someone living an austere lifestyle it would be easier but if you’ve put down roots it’s much harder.

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)
[–] MisterOwl@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

What? No!

Okay, maybe everything more than 60 miles outside of Chicago can stay. Deal?

[–] Pulptastic@midwest.social 2 points 5 days ago

Nope sorry. Janesville has to stay too but we’ll take Madison and Milwaukee.