this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
107 points (99.1% liked)
chapotraphouse
13885 readers
934 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
So some frothing chud tried to do a mass shooting at the protest, protestors shot back, and hit everyone but the chud?
Unless I'm not reading this correctly. There was no "frothing chud" who "tried to do a mass shooting". There was an open carry protester, who the "peacekeepers" believed to be a gunman. They engaged him, he fled, they shot at him, hitting him and killing another.
ooooh the way it was worded lead me to believe someone was trying to do a mass shooting, wow what a bunch of buffoons.
Yeah that's how the rent-a-cops and 50501 libs are trying to frame it to get out of any responsibility
I thought the same thing. Now I'm confused and have no idea who's in the wrong lol.
The volunteer "peacekeepers" with clearly no training for this situation hold the most blame from what I've seen. According to what I could surmise from reports and photos, they shot at a leftist who was non-threateningly carrying a rifle, in an open carry state where protesters have been openly armed a number of times, before even saying anything to him or warning anyone. He was in all black with a balaclava so I understand why they were afraid, really the blame more falls on whoever let them be "security" for such an event that definitely would have had threats against it from chuds.
Nope. Principled anti-fascist was armed, lib rent-a-cops freaked out and started shooting into a crowd for no reason and are trying to pin it on the protester who never fired a shot