this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
809 points (99.0% liked)

politics

24228 readers
2928 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Tulsi Gabbard left no doubt when she testified to Congress about Iran’s nuclear program earlier this year.

The country was not building a nuclear weapon, the national intelligence director told lawmakers, and its supreme leader had not reauthorized the dormant program even though it had enriched uranium to higher levels.

But Donald Trump dismissed the assessment of U.S. spy agencies during an overnight flight back to Washington as he cut short his trip to the Group of Seven summit to focus on the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran.

“I don’t care what she said,” Trump told reporters. In his view, Iran was “very close” to having a nuclear bomb.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Are we now choosing to believe what Tulsi says because it fits the narrative?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (5 children)

The alternative is believing Israel's government...

And they're an openly genocidal far right government made up of violent religious extremists...

Like, America is bad right now

But Israel has been on some straight up Nazi shit for a while now, because both Biden and Trump let Israel do whatever

Saying Iran isn't building nukes is the most pushback Israel has gotten since Obama was in office

[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Donald Trump is doing nazi shit all the same

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

He's doing horrible shit...

But he hasn't been actively committing a genocide like Israel has.

If you think trump is doing as bad of shit as Israel. You don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 0 points 20 hours ago

He's neck deep in supporting Israels Genocide, I would call that "actively committing"

[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Notice how I have made zero comparison to Israel I'm just commenting on Trump.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The alternative is believing Israel’s government…

That's what you replied too...

If I now said:

Everclear is the best 90s rock band

Does that mean that's the only topic you're allowed to respond to now? If you mentioned Nirvana could I tell you I never mentioned them so the band is verboten?

Maybe I'm just having a bad morning, but this shit is getting ridiculous

[–] ramune@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's definitely not you. This shit happened (and is still happening) on Reddit all the time, it's like there will always be a sizeable population that doesn't understand the concept of context and how replies to a thread are never standalone but always within the ongoing context of the thread. If they want to make a standalone comment, make a separate comment thread. But somehow that's too advanced of a concept for them to grasp.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

To be fair I was having a bad morning...

But I felt like the lady from the Thunder gun focus group multiple times today, not just there.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wnf5UzGNIVU

[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world -4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I made a comment about Trump doing bad shit. I didn't mention ANYTHING about Israel. People on lemmy really like to just put words in others mouths and get all offended over it. It's fucking annoying.

But Israel has been on some straight up Nazi shit for a while now, because both Biden and Trump let Israel do whatever

That's what I am responding to.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 4 points 1 day ago

You don’t have to believe either one.

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago

Saying Iran isn't building nukes is the most pushback Israel has gotten since Obama was in office

What kind of pushback did they get from Obama?

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This alternative is to believe the assessment that nuclear regulators made that they were stockpiling 60% enriched uranium and installing new centrifuges that could further enrich to weapons grade even faster. AFAIK there is no other plausible explanation for doing this, nuclear reactors only need 5% enrichment or so:

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/could-iran-have-been-close-to-making-a-nuclear-weapon-uranium-enrichment/

https://www.iaea.org/sites/default/files/25/06/gov2025-24.pdf

It's also not a great look Iran immediately talks about testing a nuke a day after the attack. Despite that obviously being a lie, it at least makes it clear they don't seem to be trying very hard to hide it.

I'm sure Netanyahu has all kinds of nefarious reasons for doing this and with this timing, but this pretense at least seems pretty solid unlike Gaza and I'm sure there is genuine concern throughout their citizenry over how Iran would use them against them.

[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To be frank, if I was them, I would do everything to get a nuke before the crazies in Israel and the USA decide to wipe out Iran. So Iran trying to get it makes perfect sense.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I'm sure they see it that way as well. And so here we are.

[–] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works -5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

So what? Just because she pushed back she’s now trustworthy? For fucks sake, screw your head on straight.

Also why are you even intent on defending Iran, an openly genocidal far right government made up of religious extremists? There’s no good guys in this fight.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You don't have to trust her.

But if she says the sun will come up tomorrow, it doesn't mean we need to plan to live the rest of our days in fucking darkness man...

Like. You understand that right? Someone can be a habitual liar, but that doesn't mean the opposite of everything they say is true.

[–] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I understand that, but it seems habitual liars are not lying only when it fits the narrative.

There’s plenty of evidence that points to Iran building a nuke. They are not the good guys, so excuse me for being unconcerned about their literal dictatorship getting blown to hell.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

There’s plenty of evidence that points to Iran building a nuke.

By all means share it with the class...

Because Israel's government isn't. And neither is any other government.

So I'm sure lots of people would absolutely love to see your proof

Otherwise, it's more likely Israel is lying because they've been saying Iran is a few years away from having nukes for literal decades. It means as much as Elmo saying Tesla will have auto omous driving in a few years

[–] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Someone else did it, see above.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Christ's sake...

This is the fediverse, you can't assume everyone sees the same comments when everyone's on different instances. And that's not even getting into how people block other accounts.

This is like pulling fucking teeth. So speaking of block lists...

To be fair I didn’t know that. I thought within a given thread everyone could see everything.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml -2 points 20 hours ago

They are not the good guys

Please stop getting your politics from marvel movies

[–] Zombie@feddit.uk 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Iran is authoritarian and brutal but this is the first I'm hearing of genocidal.

Got any examples I can look up?

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

They sent paramilitaries to Syria to engage in sectarian genocide.

[–] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They certainly call for genocide pretty often.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml -2 points 20 hours ago

Got any examples?

[–] octopus_ink@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 day ago

If Trump doesn't believe her, then even from his demented perspective she shouldn't have the job. So which is it Donald? Does she ah, merit her position of authority and influence, or does she not?