this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2025
158 points (99.4% liked)

Slop.

552 readers
684 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/gossip

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 37 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Ok close them then? The city can buy the empty property and use it for exactly the same thing. You've already done the work of determining the most profitable locations for stores which is really useful. The city can use the profit turned on these ideal locations to operate stores in areas you would usually not bother with because the profit isn't there.

[–] blame@hexbear.net 17 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] Awoo@hexbear.net 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Path of least resistance. They will launch dozens of court cases about it if you try and seize it for a socialist and their socialist plans, not to mention some of those cases will go in front of judges hostile to socialists and set precedents we don't want.

Yeah I know libs have seized stuff before but they'll do it purely because it's a socialist doing it for socialist plans.

[–] spectre@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago

It's socialism in one city so they are subject to the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's a one time expense that isn't even that huge in order to meaningfully shift at least a facet of the relations of production. Expropriation is cool but it's not worth it here if you can afford to buy the plots.

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You’re assuming spiteful billionaire will willingly part with them.

[–] BakerBagel@midwest.social 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Eminent domain is always am option

[–] SweatySteven@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago

That's not going to happen. The upper class will lose their shit if even a single 200 sq ft air lot is eminent domained.