this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
121 points (99.2% liked)

news

24149 readers
644 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Image is sourced from this People's Dispatch article, depicting communists attending the 2023 funeral of Communist Party President Guillermo Teillier, who was tortured for years under Pinochet's regime and helped rebuild the Communist Party while under a fascist dictatorship.


We had the Six Day War in 1967, we had the Nineteen Day War (Yom Kippur) in 1973, and now we've had the Twelve Day War. I wonder how many more very short wars will plague the region until Palestine is freed?

However, moving on from Western Asia from a little while, we have some interesting news from Chile - the former labor minister and communist, Jeannette Jara, has won the primary election for the left-wing bloc in a landslide (~60% of the vote), as the current President, Gabriel Boric, is term-limited. Her achievements include a minimum wage increase and a reduction of the work week to 40 hours.

In November, Jara will face down the contenders from other parties, including José Antonio Kast, who is analogous to Brazil's Bolsonaro. Unfortunately, Jara is now the lead figure of a party that has been taking quite a few Ls under Boric's leadership. Ostensibly a Democratic Socialist, he ruled as - you guessed it - a neoliberal, bending the knee to the US and EU. He not only failed to overthrow the Pinochet-era constitution, he actually allowed the right-wing to turn the proposed new constitution into something worse, and had to settle for campaigning against the new one and keeping the old one. And he had very little solidarity with other left-leaning leaders on the continent, like Maduro, Lula, Petro, or Castillo.

With this in mind, I cannot help but look at Argentina's very recent history and feel a little dread - but if anybody can save Chile at this point, it can only be a communist.


Last week's thread is here.
The Imperialism Reading Group is here.

Please check out the RedAtlas!

The bulletins site is here. Currently not used.
The RSS feed is here. Also currently not used.

Israel-Palestine Conflict

If you have evidence of Israeli crimes and atrocities that you wish to preserve, there is a thread here in which to do so.

Sources on the fighting in Palestine against Israel. In general, CW for footage of battles, explosions, dead people, and so on:

UNRWA reports on Israel's destruction and siege of Gaza and the West Bank.

English-language Palestinian Marxist-Leninist twitter account. Alt here.
English-language twitter account that collates news.
Arab-language twitter account with videos and images of fighting.
English-language (with some Arab retweets) Twitter account based in Lebanon. - Telegram is @IbnRiad.
English-language Palestinian Twitter account which reports on news from the Resistance Axis. - Telegram is @EyesOnSouth.
English-language Twitter account in the same group as the previous two. - Telegram here.

English-language PalestineResist telegram channel.
More telegram channels here for those interested.

Russia-Ukraine Conflict

Examples of Ukrainian Nazis and fascists
Examples of racism/euro-centrism during the Russia-Ukraine conflict

Sources:

Defense Politics Asia's youtube channel and their map. Their youtube channel has substantially diminished in quality but the map is still useful.
Moon of Alabama, which tends to have interesting analysis. Avoid the comment section.
Understanding War and the Saker: reactionary sources that have occasional insights on the war.
Alexander Mercouris, who does daily videos on the conflict. While he is a reactionary and surrounds himself with likeminded people, his daily update videos are relatively brainworm-free and good if you don't want to follow Russian telegram channels to get news. He also co-hosts The Duran, which is more explicitly conservative, racist, sexist, transphobic, anti-communist, etc when guests are invited on, but is just about tolerable when it's just the two of them if you want a little more analysis.
Simplicius, who publishes on Substack. Like others, his political analysis should be soundly ignored, but his knowledge of weaponry and military strategy is generally quite good.
On the ground: Patrick Lancaster, an independent and very good journalist reporting in the warzone on the separatists' side.

Unedited videos of Russian/Ukrainian press conferences and speeches.

Pro-Russian Telegram Channels:

Again, CW for anti-LGBT and racist, sexist, etc speech, as well as combat footage.

https://t.me/aleksandr_skif ~ DPR's former Defense Minister and Colonel in the DPR's forces. Russian language.
https://t.me/Slavyangrad ~ A few different pro-Russian people gather frequent content for this channel (~100 posts per day), some socialist, but all socially reactionary. If you can only tolerate using one Russian telegram channel, I would recommend this one.
https://t.me/s/levigodman ~ Does daily update posts.
https://t.me/patricklancasternewstoday ~ Patrick Lancaster's telegram channel.
https://t.me/gonzowarr ~ A big Russian commentator.
https://t.me/rybar ~ One of, if not the, biggest Russian telegram channels focussing on the war out there. Actually quite balanced, maybe even pessimistic about Russia. Produces interesting and useful maps.
https://t.me/epoddubny ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/boris_rozhin ~ Russian language.
https://t.me/mod_russia_en ~ Russian Ministry of Defense. Does daily, if rather bland updates on the number of Ukrainians killed, etc. The figures appear to be approximately accurate; if you want, reduce all numbers by 25% as a 'propaganda tax', if you don't believe them. Does not cover everything, for obvious reasons, and virtually never details Russian losses.
https://t.me/UkraineHumanRightsAbuses ~ Pro-Russian, documents abuses that Ukraine commits.

Pro-Ukraine Telegram Channels:

Almost every Western media outlet.
https://discord.gg/projectowl ~ Pro-Ukrainian OSINT Discord.
https://t.me/ice_inii ~ Alleged Ukrainian account with a rather cynical take on the entire thing.


you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jack@hexbear.net 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't think this makes any strategic sense for the empire. Europe is functionally entirely subservient to the US already and the deindustrialization of Europe has been well underway for a long time. Why on earth would they want to boost China's economy in order to weaken their own vassal? Why would they want European imports to shift from the US to China? How does that strengthen the position of the empire? What does this "deal with the US" get the US that's better than what China's getting by America's self-induced trade isolation?

If this is the US's strategy, it's dumb as hell and will obviously weaken their global position in the long run. Sucks to be Europe, I guess.

[–] xiaohongshu@hexbear.net 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

My friend, mercantilism is like the oldest trick in economic warfare.

First of all, you need to understand that the only reason we have cheap goods today is because the world has a surplus of industrial capacity. If the world’s demand is larger than the supply of goods, then prices will rise globally, and Western countries would not enjoy cheap goods at all.

For the past 50 years, many developing countries have listened to the IMF (and under the coercion by World Bank and GATT/WTO) and oriented their economy into the infamous “export-led growth” model. Instead of investing in their own domestic wellbeing, they allocated significant share of the labor and resources into producing export goods. They were being told that to become a “high income country”, you have to “balance your budget” and be a fiscally responsible kid, and that means earning as much trade surplus as possible to cover up your budget deficit.

This allowed the US to enjoy the benefits simply by running a large trade deficit and turning itself into a major source of consumption to absorb the surplus exports from the rest of the world. The developing countries, on the other hand, rely on export revenues to invest domestically, and it is this constant source of consumption demand that keeps their factories running, their workers employed etc. Meanwhile, the developing countries compete with one another, by depressing wages, depreciating their own currency exchange rate etc. to maintain a competitive advantage in the export sector.

The end result is that we have an oversupply of cheap goods, where the excess is absorbed by the US running a permanent trade deficit.

Now that the US suddenly wants to impose global tariffs, and most of all, on China. What does that mean?

It will mean prices increasing in the US and American consumers purchase less goods. The share of global consumption suddenly shrinks, we now have an even more over-supply of goods against a shrinking share of consumers. Most importantly, it shuts Chinese exporters out of the American consumer market. As a result, China has to dump their cheap goods elsewhere or else their manufacturing sector will go into slump, and unemployment will rise. This is also a very bad timing for China because of the recent pandemic, and the property market imploding also means many people are less likely to spend as their savings dwindle, and the local governments facing a debt crisis since they could no longer leverage the rising land price to pay off the huge amount of debt taken out for infrastructure building.

So somebody else has to buy China’s huge surplus of goods originally intended for the Americans. Naturally, they dump the goods into Europe, which will kill off the European domestic industries because the Europeans simply cannot compete with the cheap and perhaps even superior Chinese goods, if they don’t also put up tariffs like the Americans. This is why the EU put up tariffs against Chinese EV last year as soon as Biden did so.

On the other hand, if they refuse Chinese goods, they will also run into problems with importing critical materials for their own industries. The rare earth export restriction was just such a reminder to them. But worse of all, reduced Chinese imports from the EU means a surplus of export goods that cannot be sold elsewhere, and the European factories will have to close down and layoff their workers, leading to a recession.

This is why EU has no choice but to fold, especially with their energy prices jacked up after the Nord Stream bombing.

And this is why Trump’s tariff is a financial warfare, where failing businesses prime them to be harvested by the American finance capital. If this situation is not resolved in some ways, we could be looking at mass IMF bailouts in the Global South at a scale not seen before.

There is no re-industrialization, despite what Trump says! The guy leading Trump’s “trade war” is Scott Bessent, who was responsible for the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis. This is a finance guy doing finance thing. I’ve written about this in a previous comment on the very interesting history of Southeast Asia.

The only way out is for China to start importing from the Global South countries, and that means China has to start raising wages (by a lot) for its working class and give up its net exporter status.

[–] jack@hexbear.net 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My friend, mercantilism is like the oldest trick in economic warfare.

Yes, but for your merchants, not your greatest enemy's!

First of all, you need to understand that the only reason we have cheap goods today is because the world has a surplus of industrial capacity. If the world’s demand is larger than the supply of goods, then prices will rise globally, and Western countries would not enjoy cheap goods at all [excerpted to avoid wall of text] The end result is that we have an oversupply of cheap goods, where the excess is absorbed by the US running a permanent trade deficit.

Agreed on all counts, uncontroversial among Marxists (hopefully).

It will mean prices increasing and American consumers purchase less goods. The share of global consumption suddenly shrinks, we now have an even more over-supply of goods against a shrinking share of consumers. Most importantly, it shuts Chinese exporters out of the American consumer market. As a result, China has to dump their cheap goods elsewhere or else their manufacturing sector will go into slump, and unemployment will rise. This is also a very bad timing for China because of the recent pandemic, and the property market imploding also means many people are less likely to spend as their savings dwindle.

They seem to be pulling this off successfully without much issue given their increase in external trade and internal consumption (I know it's not as fast as you want but it is faster than basically anywhere else in the world).

So somebody else has to buy China’s huge surplus of goods. Naturally, they dump the goods into Europe, which will kill off the European domestic industries because they simply cannot compete with the cheap and perhaps even superior Chinese goods, if they don’t also put up tariffs like the Americans. This is why the EU put up tariffs against Chinese EV last year as soon as Biden did so.

On the other hand, if they refuse Chinese goods, they will also run into problems with importing critical materials for their own industries. The rare earth export restriction was just such a reminder to them. But worse of all, reduced Chinese imports from the EU means a surplus of export goods that cannot be sold elsewhere, and the European factories will have to close down and layoff their workers, leading to a recession.

This is why EU has no choice but to fold, especially with their energy prices jacked up after the Nord Stream bombing.

But in what way was the destruction of Europe help the health of the empire in the long run? Obviously American capitalists are all about it in the short term, but it weakens the overall position of the empire relative to China, which is far more significant geopolitically.

And this is why Trump’s tariff is a financial warfare, where failing businesses prime them to be harvested by the American finance capital. If this situation is not resolved in some ways, we could be looking at mass IMF bailouts in the Global South at a scale not seen before.

But China is establishing alternative financial systems to the IMF and World Bank. The PRC and BRICS bank are increasingly more important to the financial backing of the third world while the imperialist financial systems continue to lose their group. The intraimperial cannibalism of US capitalists consuming Europe's industrial capital will only further degrade the ability of the US to impose those conditions on the global south.

This is my whole point . Sure there's some upsides to some segments of the US financial class, but both the financial and industrial economy globally are shifting further and further away from US control, and all these efforts to tighten the grip only cause more countries to squeeze out and go to China/BRICS. This is not to say everything is resolved and imperialism is defeated. China has to settle the internal class conflict that's producing various economic crises within the country, but those pale in comparison to the financial crises that run through every single facet of American life because the power of the capitalist class is unchecked to an extent that even the most powerful and corrupt Chinese capitalists would struggle to conceive. BRICS has the fundamental flaw of India, who constantly straddles the imperialist and anti-imperialist worlds in pursuit of its own objectives, but more and more global industry, finance, and raw population continue to enter the BRICS sphere while the imperial sphere shrinks continuously. China remains incredibly cautious on the global stage, and I think we all agree that they can and should take more strident anti-imperialist action. But the BRI and other initiatives have very meaningfully decentered the imperial core in the economic world of the global south. And of course, until the empire is truly defeated, it will continue to wreak terrible havoc on whatever country it can prey on - but that list of countries keeps shrinking.

It is going to be a messy, bloody path to the collpase of imperialism. The trends could reverse and the US could find a way to reassert itself and force the rest of the world to buckle. But it seems like all it can really manage is to consume the working classes of the imperial core to its own long term detriment and commit unspeakable crimes in West Asia. Meanwhile, China slowly - too slowly, yes - is building the alternative economic order that is one of several necessary preconditions for the eventual victory of global socialism.

There is no re-industrialization, despite what Trump says!

Of course, I've said as much in this thread.

[–] xiaohongshu@hexbear.net 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

But in what way was the destruction of Europe help the health of the empire in the long run? Obviously American capitalists are all about it in the short term, but it weakens the overall position of the empire relative to China, which is far more significant geopolitically.

The EU has been the true challenger to American capitalism since its formation in the 1990s. When the Soviet Union dissolved in 1991, because its economy was never financialized, the American and European capitalists had been able to harvest their industrial assets and monetized them.

The amount of finance capital generated from monetizing Soviet industrial assets was so vast that it instantly allowed the US and the EU to “hyperleap” into fully neoliberalized economy, and the EU was born in 1993. The creation of euro would soon follow and officially adopted in 1999.

Since then, the euro has emerged as a challenger to dethrone the dollar. It is no coincidence that the Balkan conflicts started as soon as the EU was formed, to keep the EU to spend on militarization. It is also no coincidence that when Saddam wanted to sell his oil in euro, Iraq was immediately invaded in 2003. It is also unlikely to be a coincidence that as soon as Nord Stream was built, the Ukrainian fascist coup and civil war took place in late 2013. Finally, when Nord Stream 2 was completed, the current Russia-Ukraine war happened.

The goal of the US finance capital has always been to kill the euro. This is why the Russia-Ukraine war has to happen:

As you can see, Chinese yuan poses little to no threat to the US. In fact, China has repeatedly stated that they are not interested in anything other than the status quo, which is to preserve the dollar hegemony that has benefited its economy so much.

This is also why after the Ukraine war, when Putin was rallying other countries and calling to de-dollarize, China (and Xi) has been unusually quiet about it. Because why should they?

If the Ukraine war and the $300 billion confiscation of Russian foreign reserves cannot make China give up the dollar, then Trump’s trade war has even smaller chance of doing so.

The PRC and BRICS bank are increasingly more important to the financial backing of the third world while the imperialist financial systems continue to lose their group.

This changes nothing, because China has been very reluctant to internationalize the RMB to preserve its export advantage. It doesn’t want others to hold Chinese yuan as a savings currency, and they’re more than happy to let the dollar play that role.

What has been happening with BRICS are countries starting to adopt bilateral/multilateral currency trade to reduce exposure of their dollar reserves from being confiscated by the US. This is more of a protective measure than de-dollarization, which I have explained again and again, that it can only happen at the real production/trade level i.e. China importing goods and replacing the role of the US as a net importer.

In the same vein, when saving, these countries will still swap the foreign currencies into USD through the forex market.

I’ll give you an example: after the Ukraine war erupted, Russia who was cut off from the dollar began to sell large quantity of oil to India, and accumulated a vast amount of Indian rupees. However, Russia soon realized that it cannot use those rupees at all, because after accounting for importing goods from India, there is nothing else for it to do.

Russia cannot sell rupee to buy Chinese yuan so they can use them to purchase Chinese goods, because the Indian central bank would not allow it as it will fuck with their exchange rate. And the forex market isn’t interested in holding rupee and trading away their yuan, at least not at a price favorable to them. As a result, Russia was forced to hold all the rupees they cannot use while sending away valuable commodities e.g. oil to India, practically for free.

The problem for most countries is that nobody wants to accumulate their currencies. The US dollar does not care though. You are free to use the dollar to do whatever you want: buy Chinese yuan, Indian rupee, gold, crypto, anything that people are willing to sell in exchange for the US dollar. And this is why the dollar is the global reserve currency, not the yuan or the rupee.

The problem for Russia is that it has been shut out from accessing the dollar, but for other countries, they will still buy the USD. This is why the foreign holder of US treasuries has increased in spite of Trump’s debacle, simply that it has switched hands - the Chinese no longer hold as much treasuries, and the money ended up in the UK, Japan and the Cayman Islands end up buying those treasuries. Everything has to balance out.

[–] TechnoAnomie@hexbear.net 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Since then, the euro has emerged as a challenger to dethrone the dollar

Germany might thing so, but it was so dysfunctionally designed there was never a chance of that, inevitably and in short order killing demand for their own production. EU consumption levels will not remain while throwing 3.5% to the MIC black-hole (plus 1.5% for ?something?), funded through national budgets which must remove that amount from the economy in addition to the rest of the permanent austerity

I don't know what that implies for the US.

[–] xiaohongshu@hexbear.net 5 points 17 hours ago

It is true that the euro is extremely poorly designed. No argument against that.

However it still pisses the US off that the Europeans were able to take advantage of the Soviet assets to turn itself into an economic powerhouse that could at least, tilt the balance of power in the grand scheme of things.

For example, if the EU were to stand behind China, then the US would be under even more threat. This is why the Ukraine war has to happen, to sink the euro as a potential alternative to the dollar, and their way of preventing backstabbing by the Europeans is to ensure that the Europeans do not have the means of doing so.