this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2025
89 points (91.6% liked)

chapotraphouse

13967 readers
770 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Notice how solar-punk aesthetic envisions comfortable lives built on technology others created. It shows the result of labor without showing the labor itself.

[–] MizuTama@hexbear.net 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

built on technology others created

Whenever I saw it, I presumed it was stuff built and maintained by those depicted, and we were seeing the in-between as conditions reached a point where the relative downtime was enough that it was the majority of experienced time.

[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sure, but it's equally possible to interpret it in other ways as well. That's the problem here, how things are created is left up to your imagination. Solar-punk aesthetic is equally compatible with people enjoying the fruits of their own labour or a society built on slavery.

[–] MizuTama@hexbear.net 4 points 1 month ago

Ah, phrased that way, I can definitely see that. Especially considering how much of it comes from the West, where much of our material comforts comes from exploitative labor. Good criticism.

[–] iridaniotter@hexbear.net 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Notice how solarpunk aesthetic envisions a lifestyle completely at odds with its productive forces. No, I don't think your household windmill is going to sustain that level of civilization! You will build 20 MW Chinese wind turbines and you will enjoy your high level of electricity consumption.