this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2025
89 points (92.4% liked)
chapotraphouse
13930 readers
808 users here now
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I'm not disagreeing with you on the principle but what kind of population numbers did those indigenous tribes have? We've got 8,2 billion people on this thing now.
Picking up the criticism about solarpunk here; if your future only works after most people are dead for some reason or another it's not exactly utopian or even good.
Read Communism: the Highest Stage of Ecology
https://www.iskrabooks.org/communism-the-highest-stage-of-ecology
This is a lack of rigorous thinking, from someone I presume is capable of debunking the Black Book of Communism.
For the vast majority of middle-income, upper-middle-income, and high-income countries, the total fertility rate is below the replacement level, and even below 1.6 in the imperial core. After a century of this, we're back to a world population of 2 billion people, a figure that no one would argue is inherently overpopulated. Even if the TFR harmonically regresses to 2.05, we would be fine. Communism could "kill" 5 billion more people and be the most peaceful world-system in modern history.
Those indigenous peoples had 100 million people just in North America, which is proportional to about 600 million people globally.
great, that only leaves about 7,9 billion others to account for then
Please read the whole comment and follow the math, it's not that complicated.
are you positioning the solar punk five years from now or 105 years from now? we (well, some of our progeny) could return to 1920s population numbers over a long period of time by individual reproductive choices without any mass killing or government policy. there's only a missing population if you think the art is depicting next week.