this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2023
229 points (92.9% liked)

politics

18863 readers
4004 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 18 points 11 months ago (1 children)

if I did buy one, it wouldn't be out of fear of brown people paragliding into my house. It would be out of fear of white fascist Republicans breaking down my front door.

As a Portland resident, that's a logical fear:

https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/proud-boys-oath-keepers-antifa-portland-violence-spreading-1224762/

Members of any at risk group should consider being armed. The police aren't there to protect you and there have been court cases which ruled they have no obligation to do so.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1525280/

"In a 7–2 opinion, the Supreme Court ruled that due process principles did not create a constitutional right to police protection, despite the existence of a court-issued restraining order."

[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

One thing I know, every liberal gun owner is a marksman. They've trained with their firearms and know them fifty times better than a Conservative does.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago (3 children)
[–] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

7.62-MM M14 with a walnut stock. Trained with it during my military days but I didn't take it on deployment. I was stuck with the M16A2 in Afghanistan and M4 carbine in Iraq.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

I had someone not believe me when I told them they still issued M16s in Iraq and Afghanistan.

"Wikipedia told me they switched to the M4 entirely!?!?"

Yeah, okay bud, just like they're going to be using nothing but the M5 in another decade.

Or two...

Or three.

I bet you could get issued a M1 under the right circumstances.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

People who don't know how deep military warehouses go. Wouldn't surprise me if there weren't some WWI field phones floating around somewhere.

[–] weirdwallace75@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Isn't the Army still issuing M1903s? With warehouses like that, they'll never fully modernize!

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Nice! Mine's a Henry in .45-70 Government. Good for most big game in North America. Marlin briefly had theirs rated for T-Rex as a cross promo for Jurassic World. LOL.

[–] SCB@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Is this gun tiny or is this table enormous?

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Oh, it's a big damn table. LOL.

It's a normal sized rifle, it's not a cannon or anything. Spec sheet has it at 38.1" (96.77cm) with a 19.8" (50.3cm) barrel. Weighs just over 7 pounds unloaded.

[–] _apokalipto_@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

European here, what is that? Genuine question, it looks very shiney and expensive.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That is a side-gated, lever action, Henry rifle, chambered in .45-70 government. It's rated for any big game in North America. With an added scope with 5x magnification.

https://www.henryusa.com/caliber/45-70/

[–] _apokalipto_@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

you are goddamn right